home

Oklahoma Bombing and Conspiracy Theories

Journalist, author and blogger David Neiwert makes a lot of sense in trying to figure out what's "so new" about the material reported this week in the Associated Press on McVeigh and Oklahoma, and in his description of what could use further investigation:
Well, a lot of it has to do with the investigation itself. As I've explored in some depth in Salon, there are still some very important unanswered questions about the case. Some of them -- particularly the credibility of, and the circumstances surrounding, the eyewitness identifications of McVeigh and Nichols during the bomb-building phase in Kansas -- cut deeply against the government's own conclusions.
If you are interested in the Oklahoma bombing case, and you haven't yet read David's Salon piece, you should. He really nails the problems with the Government's eyewitnesses and its insistence that "John Doe 2" was not a co-conspirator.

< Mississippi Lawsuit Opens Over Death Row Conditions | Revisionism for the Dems >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort: