If he wins two, he'll probably drop out.  If he wins 3 or 4, he'll stick it out till the 15th and then drop out.

But if Clinton comes out of Super Tuesday with a 66 delegate margin, he's done. He cannot catch up.

The list goes on and on: Vince Foster was Hillary Clinton's personal friend, so of course the truth about his suicide in 1993 has given way to myth and conspiracy theory from those who believe Hillary was somehow involved in the death. The more unscrupulous on the right have always peddled that nonsense as proof Hillary has a "body count" attached to her (of which Foster was only one). There was the haranguing over Hillary's "missing law firm records," which was a lot of nothing piled on top of even more nothing. There was "Travelgate," in which routine staff changes in the White House were transformed into accusations of cronyism and in which Hillary was lambasted by Republicans for allegedly using the FBI and IRS to harass the former head of the White House travel office. (Comparable to the modern right's obsession with a phony story about "Obama's IRS" auditing conservative groups.)  There was "Filegate," which saw Republicans pillory the Clintons, Hillary in particular, over a minor bureaucratic mix-up in which a Hillary hire at the Office of White House Counsel accessed files he didn't have the authority to. And of course, at the tail end of their time in the White House, Hillary was accused of helping to "loot" the White House on her way out, supposedly shipping materials to the Clintons' new home in Upstate New York.

All of this was investigated and all of it was found to be crap. But Hillary Clinton's ongoing political career only gave her GOP adversaries more alleged controversies to gin-up. She engaged in dirty dealings and then covered them up. She sold secrets to China. Her long-time adviser Huma Abedin was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and her parents had ties to al-Qaeda. She was involved in the Watergate scandal, for Christ's sake, and had ties to right-wing boogeyman Saul Alinsky. And of course, she personally got four Americans killed in Benghazi and endangered the safety and security of the United States by way of her personal server and e-mail account. She's a lying liar and a cheating cheat. She's a political Cthulu who drives men to madness by sheer force of her inhuman will and absolute malevolence. This is the caricature version of Hillary Clinton the right has carefully cultivated and hammered into the national consciousness for decades now. And if you're a liberal who believes these things about Clinton -- if you see her as anything other than a liberal Democrat who's guilty of nothing more than being a politician with faults and with a plethora of enemies like every other on this planet, including Bernie Sanders -- you've proven that the protracted smear campaign against this woman has worked. You prove that the GOP won a long time ago.

While you certainly have the right to support whomever you want in the Democratic primaries, you ought to at least acknowledge that yours is very much a minority point of view. You don't get to define for the rest of us who's a good Democrat and who's not.

If he wanted to attack the candidate and party, be should have run as an independent.

Also, where are all these people when it comes time to vote for him?  Dem turnout is significantly LOWER than 2098.

 Not, by Senator Sanders, necessarily, but by some of his supporters.  My hope is that Senator Sanders will soon recognize the situation and transition into a key supporter of the Democratic nominee.

 Ordinarily, it would seem right for Senator Sanders to keep up the fight as long as he could, each for mutually constructive purposes.   But, these are no ordinary times.  The Democratic campaign needs all the time, all its resources and all its energies to challenge Trump, a real menace to this country.

Bernie has a good message. He is leading a discussion that is critical to the U.S. going forward. The attacks on Clinton do nothing to advance that cause.

Hard to believe Bernie is not enough of a statesman to understand how important what he does next really is.

As to why Tulsi she did what she did in endorsing Sanders after yesterday's thorough trouncing, only she knows for sure. I certainly agree that her timing was odd.

But suffice to say that as of today, there are evermore island Democrats who are becoming increasingly exasperated with Ms. Gabbard's self-aggrandizing performance art in Washington of late. And she better start listening to the folks back home a lot more, and paying a lot less attention to her D.C. handlers and media advisers.

I think Julian Castro would be a good choice. He has served as a mayor and now in the Cabinet. After 8 years as Veep he will have learned so much that will make him a good bet for president. And, as a Latino, he would excite a very large group of voters and potential voters.