home

No Verdict Today in John Edwards Trial

Update: No verdict today, the jurors asked for some exhibits and a board to write and markers. Their requests pertained to the Bunny Mellon contributions.

Update: Here are the final instructions given to the jury in the John Edwards trial.

I really want to write something positive today, to give Team Edwards support and let them know that, outside of North Carolina, there are people like me and TalkLeft readers who think John Edwards has gotten the short end of the stick in this trial.

[More]

I don't have much to say about closings, because there's no detailed coverage and I don't have the transcripts. Final Jury instructions should be posted today, after the jury begins deliberating. The jury were read the instructions Thursday. In a trial like this, the instructions can make or break the case.

I'll leave you with a few things to tide you over while waiting:

That ought to get you started. I'm keeping my fingers crossed all day.

Update: The judge didn't define what reasonable doubt is, only what it is not.

This is a heavy and strict burden, the highest in the law and higher than the burden of proof in civil cases; but it does not require the government to prove a defendant’s guilt beyond all possible doubt. The test is one of reasonable doubt.

The law presumes that reasonable doubt is a concept within the ordinary competence of a jury, that is, that you will be able to apply reasonable doubt according to its plain, ordinary, and everyday meaning. Therefore, I will not define any further what is, or is not, reasonable doubt.

< Zimmerman Discovery Released | From the George Zimmerman Discovery >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Definitely has my support (5.00 / 2) (#1)
    by ruffian on Fri May 18, 2012 at 12:01:22 PM EST
    The donors saying they were not making a campaign contribution, and the money never going into the campaign account makes it clear enough to me that whatever was going on had nothing to do with an attempt to break campaign finance law.  

    And the (inadmissible) fact theFEC said the money (5.00 / 2) (#2)
    by Angel on Fri May 18, 2012 at 12:21:14 PM EST
    wasn't campaign contributions.  

    Parent
    Yes - the jury should be able to know that (5.00 / 3) (#3)
    by ruffian on Fri May 18, 2012 at 02:18:30 PM EST
    IMO. What if they convict and find that out later?

    Parent
    Yes, and the judge's instructions (5.00 / 2) (#4)
    by KeysDan on Fri May 18, 2012 at 02:40:49 PM EST
    that reasonable doubt is not all possible doubt would hardly have been necessary if the jury had the entire record to evaluate.   As it is, it is unfair to the jury's deliberations,  not to mention justice for  John Edwards, of course.

    Parent
    </