home

Updated Figures on Crisis in Japan

1 am MT: The Kyodo News Agency reports more than 2,000 people have died or are unaccounted for. In Minamisanriku, a town in Miyagi with 10,000 people, more than 5,000 people are unaccounted for. The police chief thinks the toll in Miyagi could exceed 10,000. Hundreds of bodies have been found under rubble. In one town hit by the Tsunami, the town hall and a nursing home were swept out to sea. Neither the mayor nor the elderly patients have been heard from.

20,000 buildings have been damaged or destroyed and more than 300,000 in six perfectures have been evacuated. The power outages may last weeks. The LA Times has some descriptive photos of the destruction here. For this family, it's like watching a scene from that new show Waking Dead. What an awful shock. One day life is fine, the next day it's gone. These picture pretty well capture the extent of the property damage in that area.

At least 160 people have been tested for radiation exposure from the nuclear reactors. Six reactors have now failed or are in danger of failing.

[More...]

An additional reactor was added to the list early Sunday, for a total of six — three at the Dai-ichi complex and three at another nearby complex. A second explosion is now expected at the building housing the third reactor at the Fukushima Daiichi plant.. Local evacuations have been ordered at each location. Japan has a total of 55 reactors spread across 17 complexes nationwide.[More...]

Advice for those near the reactors:

Public broadcaster NHK flashed instructions to evacuees to close doors and windows, switch off air-conditioning fans and place wet towels over the nose and mouth, as well as to cover up as much as possible.

The effects of radiation:

Severe exposure to radiation causes damage to organ tissue and raises the likelihood of developing cancer, tumours and causing genetic damage. Symptoms include nausea, vomiting and hair loss and severe exposure causes death in 50 percent of cases.

Here's the explanation for the failure of the third reactor yesterday.

As for what caused the earthquake and Tsunamim the New York Times has a report saying it was "Shifting Plates."

On a positive note, soldiers rescued 5,800 people in the Miyagi town of Kesennuma. Japan is trying hard and 95 other countries have offered their assistance.

If you've found any reputable relief agencies to accept your donations, please put them in comments. And thnnk good thoughts for Japan and the Japanese. This is going to require long-term rebuilding.

For those whose homes and workplaces were destroyed, how about if other countries give visas to those affected who have relatives in the donor country. It might relieve additional burden from Japan, and at least keep families unified.

< Saturday Night Open Thread | Sunday Night Open Thread >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    A few options (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by richj25 on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 04:13:32 AM EST
    The Red Cross has a button up at Amazon.com.
    GlobalGiving, Doctors without borders, MercyCorps,
    Save the children. I'm sure there are more but this is a start,

    What strikes me is the wide extent (5.00 / 2) (#5)
    by ruffian on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 07:25:59 AM EST
    or the horrible damage. Town after town after town destroyed. Looking at those pictures, if it all happened in one place it would be horrible enough. But the pictures are from at least five or six towns, all covered with debris and mud. Incomprehensible.

    If they cannot prevent (5.00 / 1) (#20)
    by Zorba on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 02:25:45 PM EST
    multiple melt-downs in their severely damaged nuclear reactors, it could get even worse, unfortunately.  It's probably not the wisest idea to have nuclear reactors sitting on top of major, unstable fault lines (which pretty much includes most, if not all, of the Ring of Fire on the Pacific Rim).  I truly hope and pray that the reactors do not melt down.  The Japanese people have enough to deal with.  

    Parent
    San Onofre in Southern California (none / 0) (#25)
    by Dadler on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 03:04:47 PM EST
    Comes to mind. Always made me nervous while I lived there, especially when we'd get a quake or one of these tsunami warnings hit.  Now I'm north, however, and so very safe.  Yes, you must trek for an entire half mile up the hill from my house to stand at the southern end of San Andreas Lake (LINK), which sits right on top of its namesake fault.  Sigh.

    Parent
    I actually checked fault lines (5.00 / 0) (#27)
    by nycstray on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 03:17:24 PM EST
    before I moved back :P

    didn't think about tsunami activity though. . . .

    Parent

    Given how well-prepared Japan (5.00 / 3) (#7)
    by andgarden on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 08:47:29 AM EST
    supposedly was, I get the sinking feeling that this is the kind of disaster you simply can't prepare adequately for.

    I was watching a discussion (5.00 / 1) (#10)
    by Militarytracy on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 12:51:31 PM EST
    of their economic reality.  We are on the Japan road too, we have applied a lot of the same solutions to our economic insolvency that Japan used.

    An economist was discussing how difficult it is going to be for Japan to repair and rebuild because it was so insolvent and made their economy so weak.  He was saying that Japan must encourage immigration, but if you have visited you know that every square inch of earth in Japan is working to sustain the existing population.  Somehow the world must break free from these economists who keep trying to sell us an economy based on ponzi schemes of over population....creating demand by creating too many mouths to feed.

    IMmigration? (none / 0) (#13)
    by sj on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 01:44:23 PM EST
    Seriously?  That is some messed up analysis.

    Parent
    I thought so too (none / 0) (#14)
    by Militarytracy on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 01:50:04 PM EST
    There's so much damage to overcome and all that the economists trying to keep genies in bottles can think about is that Japan needs some immigration.

    Parent
    Emigration (none / 0) (#16)
    by Jeralyn on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 02:09:42 PM EST
    is what I was referring to, not immigration into Japan. So people in Japan could go elsewhere if it becomes too dangerous to stay there.

    Parent
    That's how I read your comments (none / 0) (#19)
    by sj on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 02:17:27 PM EST
    And it sounds a compassionate and reasonable policy that would be fairly easy to implement.  I think it's a most excellent idea.

    My incredulity was at the analysis MT was relating.

    Parent

    Yes, immigration (none / 0) (#21)
    by andgarden on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 02:30:44 PM EST
    This probably isn't the place to discuss the issue, but Japan needs to get past it's nativism and welcome immigrants.

    Parent
    It seems to me though (5.00 / 1) (#24)
    by Militarytracy on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 03:01:04 PM EST
    that nativism developes naturally when resources are too stretched.  In Japan, just like South Korea...every inch of earth is used to support the existing population.  Sometimes people think that simply because you can find farmland, that means more people can be pushed in.  But the farmland is feeding the mouths in the cities.  I believe that Japan suffers the nativism that it does due to overpopulation.  And it bothers me that some people insist that populations must continue to grow in order to grow a larger and larger tax base.  It isn't sustainable.  I think we must learn to grow different economies or suffer the destruction of the world's resources that can't be repaired.

    Parent
    Malthus hasn't been right yet (none / 0) (#26)
    by andgarden on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 03:06:38 PM EST
    Somehow I'm pretty sure (5.00 / 1) (#32)
    by Militarytracy on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 05:51:40 PM EST
    that the kids growing up as throw aways in our great American foster child system would disagree with you as well as many starving children on the African continent.

    Parent
    I kind of agree with you both (none / 0) (#34)
    by sj on Sun Mar 13, 2011 at 06:58:40 PM EST
    I mean I don't agree with the unilateral statement that andgarden made, but the thing is there are enough resources (so far) on this great blue planet to feed its inhabitants.  As with so many other resources, it's not being distributed for political, economic and logistical reasons.  Are there statistics on how much rots in silos?  I don't think so, I just went looking for information, and it's referred to, but not reported on.

    I went to a lecture once where the lecturer declared that the true heresy -- the true crime against God -- is that there people are starving in this world of plenty.  I don't recall a word of the rest of the lecture, but I can't tell you how often I've thought of that and I cannot disagree.

    Regardless of religious beliefs, I think we need to really grok that idea.