I'm still in hearing mode.
Open Thread.
Make a new account
I second that!
You would think they'd be wary for that reason alone.
Not to mention the fact that having flying killer robots is just... creepy and entirely disturbing on a moral level. Parent
Probably too late to sound the alarm in regards to Playstation-Mentality War...we're there and we ain't going back. Parent
Under President Obama, the C.I.A. has steadily increased the number of missile attacks against targets in Pakistan's tribal areas by remotely piloted Predator and Reaper drones. As of May 28, the C.I.A. had carried out 38 strikes this year, compared with 53 for all of 2009, according to The Long War Journal, a Web site that tracks the number of strikes.
Smart people don't mess with 'em. They don't miss. Parent
I mean, that just seemed like a disaster-in-the-making. Parent
Herlequin: a mythical figure who led a band of demons across the sky on ghostly horses, terrifying peasants with their attacks in the dead of night - the threat of which was used by nobility in feudal times to control the populace. Parent
US and Pakistani security officials believe that Mr. Yazid, along with members of his family, was recently killed by an American drone attack in Pakistan's tribal areas. Yazid's death is being claimed as a counterterrorism victory, but analysts said that Al Qaeda is quick to appoint successors to key posts.
CSM Parent
Perhaps that appeals to the "Gunfight in the street" mentality we have, but what it also means that more of us will be killed.
Have you considered the risk you, and the worthless UN, ask some of us to bear? Parent
Seems to me the more technological the slaughter, the less pause in using the technology to slaughter. Parent
Currently, 121 members of Congress HAVE served in the military. Parent
Think of the thousands of US troops and Vietnamese killed because we didn't use all we had.
Who asks them if they had rather died than use drones?? Parent
I mean, they already got into the camera system. How long till they get into the controller?
Honestly with the long range missle capabilities we have and the other types of gunships I just think it's a completely uneccessary risk to have unmanned killing machines flying around. Parent
Security problems?
Nope, no concern here. Parent
You think we should've used nuclear weapons? Why not just come out and say it? It's not like people aren't aware already that you're slightly unhinged.. Parent
Always the reframer, eh?
lol Parent
According to the segment the Lakota won the battle because they had more technologically advanced weapons than Custer's army; they repeating rifles while the army guys had single-shot weapons.
Technology matters. Parent
If you wanna keep the body count down in a conflict...hand to hand is the way to go. Busting a face open with your fist kinda turns you off in a way playing with a joystick in front of a screen does not.
It's why I abhor guns...makes it too easy to take a life. If I'm gonna kill somebody I'm using a bat...so I have more chance to change my mind. Parent
I look at it as a "least you can do" type of thing...if you're gonna kill, the least you can do is get your hands dirty...I don't think the guy who pushes the red button feels it like the guy who sticks a knife in ya...and it would be nice if a killer was forced to feel it, I think we'd see less killing. Parent
Maybe it's a permanent stain no matter what method is used...depressing thought that. Parent
Also, didn't the Indians have something like a three or four to one numbers advantage, in a battle fought on open ground, at Little Bighorn? Not exactly optimal conditions for success in battle, no matter what technological advantages you might enjoy. Parent
The vessel left Ireland carrying 550 tons of cement, educational materials, toys and medical equipment - the latest effort by peace activists to deliver food and break Israel's blockade of Gaza.
http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2010/06/02/new-aid-ship-heads-for-gaza-days-after-flotilla-raid/
I especially love the fact that it's named Rachel Corrie, a name that makes most Israeli and neocon heads explode.
This incident is going to truly test our "special relationship" with Israel and with the rest of the world. Turkey and Ireland have vowed that if Israel kills any of its citizens it will face "serious consequences." Unlike the U.S., where we do squat-all when Israel murders U.S. citizen and where, as per usual, the members of both parties outdid themselves in obsequiousness to our little psychopathic child in the Mideast:
American lawmakers in both parties today expressed support for Israel in the wake of growing international condemnation of the country following its deadly raid on a flotilla of aid ships bound for the Gaza Strip.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20006501-503544.html
But of course! Hey, we've looked the other way since the Liberty bombing, why would we stop now? Unfortunately for us, the rest of the world is fed up with having Israel and with our support of it, and we're not big enough to bully them around like we used to.
The Prime Minister of Turkey called for an emergency NATO meeting. We are bound by NATO treaty obligations to respond in force to any attack on members' ships in international waters. What will we do now--withdraw from NATO to make Israel happy?
This will be very interesting to watch develop.
Fishermen have to stay within 3 miles of the coast, even though the closest shoals where there are abudant fish are 9 miles out. according to Israel Hamas uses the cement to build bunkers and melts down the tin to make weapons.
I am reporting here, not suggesting I support these policies. Parent
Hamas uses the cement to build bunkers and melts down the tin to make weapons. I am reporting here, not suggesting I support these policies.
Unfortunately for us, the rest of the world is fed up with having Israel and with our support of it, and we're not big enough to bully them around like we used to.
Yes, Israelis such a threat to Germany and Syria and Iran and Jordan and.........I mean there are just billions and billions of them.
I think we have heard that song before.... say in the mid '30's????? Parent
These days, they think Jesus is going to have one big oven for non-believers during,(or is it after?), The Rapture, so their anti-semitism only takes theological form now. Parent
Here's a big clue for Obama: if you have to rely on the fine print rationale, you aren't being honest, and you certainly aren't being transparent. Oh, but I'm sure the Parser-in-Chief has an answer for that, too. Something along the lines of, "we didn't hide it, so how can that not be transparent?"
Beware the photo op. And the optics of an Eric Holder making portentous announcements. And Obama being "angry;" distractions all, and a sure sign that something any sentient being would be opposed to has just been put into place.
That's how he rolls.
Two and a half more years of this; oh, joy. Parent
Some investors see this as a rare buying opportunity. Others said the stocks could underperform for years despite reduced valuations. They warned the uncertain outcome of the oil spill and risk to profits means investors should expect a bumpy ride in coming months. BP has seen its shares fall 36 percent since April when the spill began. The company, now facing an Obama administration criminal investigation, has lost one-third of its market value or about $67 billion (46 billion pounds) since the April 20 explosion that killed 11. "We are seeing some hedge funds have started building stakes. Political risk is driving the stock price down and makes it highly speculative. It could be value or could be a major break-up," a Zurich-based trader said. The company carries a one-year forward price-to-earnings (P/E) of 5.74, the lowest among the oil majors.
BP has seen its shares fall 36 percent since April when the spill began. The company, now facing an Obama administration criminal investigation, has lost one-third of its market value or about $67 billion (46 billion pounds) since the April 20 explosion that killed 11.
"We are seeing some hedge funds have started building stakes. Political risk is driving the stock price down and makes it highly speculative. It could be value or could be a major break-up," a Zurich-based trader said.
The company carries a one-year forward price-to-earnings (P/E) of 5.74, the lowest among the oil majors.
link
Particularly a good chance that BP will be fine in the end is that they have a lot of hungry customers to satisfy:
U.S. Petroleum Consumption 19,498,000 barrels/day U.S. Motor Gasoline Consumption 8,989,000 barrels/day (378 million gallons/day) Share of US Oil Consumption for Transportation 71%
Seems to me no one wants to pay more for gas, and most of us are fine with the status quo. Parent
Two and a half more years of this; oh, joy.
I would prefer 6 and a half. Parent
WASHINGTON -- President Obama said on Thursday that he is extending the moratorium on permits to drill new deepwater wells for six more months, as the head of the agency that oversees offshore drilling resigned under pressure.
The well that keysdan mentioned is a shallow water well. The ban for shallow drilling, set in the wake of the Deepwater disaster was for 30 days.
In response to the BP spill, the Obama administration placed a ban on new oil and gas drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. The 30 day ban gives the Interior Department until May 28th to conduct a safety review of the industry. With 30% of our oil and gas production coming out of the Gulf, existing drilling continues. Some in the industry think the ban was not well thought out. Companies that drill in the shallow water came to Washington this week to explain how their operations are different. The International Association of Drilling Contractors says the ban unfairly threatens shallow water production; mostly of natural gas.
Some in the industry think the ban was not well thought out. Companies that drill in the shallow water came to Washington this week to explain how their operations are different. The International Association of Drilling Contractors says the ban unfairly threatens shallow water production; mostly of natural gas.
You may be against all oil drilling in US, which is an entirely different subject, but to call Obama dishonest here is dishonest. Cheap shots seem to be your forte. Parent
And how come the resignation of the head of the agency didn't cause Obama to extend the shallow water drilling ban?
Also, can you find for me anywhere where I have said I am opposed to ALL drilling in the US?
You know as well as I do that the iffy, not-sure-the-public-will-like-this stuff gets done "quietly," in the hope that no one will notice. If this were all so on the up-and-up, why the "quiet?" Why not a big announcement about the results of the 30-day safety review?
Jesus, it probably took them 30 days to find the freaking rubber stamp that said "Drill, Baby, Drill."
Give me a break. Parent
No, but can you find for me anywhere where I said that you were opposed to ALL drilling in the US? Parent
squeaky, comment #82.
My "view" happens to be one that questions how an adequate safety review of shallow water drilling can be done in 30 days, and wonders how the departure of the head of MMS requires that there be a 6-month moratorium on deepwater drilling, but that same rationale does not extend to shallow water drilling.
My "view" questions the quiet resumption of permitting for shallow water wells, with no mention of this so-called safety review.
I know the US and the rest of the world are using unimaginably enormous amounts of oil, and that our demand is harming the environment. Cars and trucks and what-not are not the only users of petroleum products, you know. Give up oil, we give up pretty much everything that runs on it, or is a by-product of the machinery that manufactures pretty much everything.
There are solutions, but the government seems unwilling to commit to them - in much the same way it was unwilling to commit to really solving the health care crisis, or the financial crisis.
But beating people with the "are you ready to give up oil - didn't think so" stick, as a way to dismiss their opinions about this situation we are in, makes about as much sense as telling people that if they weren't willing to give up going to the doctor, or give up having a bank account, that nothing they had to say on the subject of health care or finance was worth considering. Parent
"You may be against all oil drilling in US..."
Is that same as saying You are against all oil drilling in the US.
You may want to crack open one of your english grammar books, and to help you I added bolding in order to help you figure out your mistake. Parent
No, I'm not telling you what to write - I'm just telling you that as long as you continue to put words in my mouth, as you routinely do because it is the only way you seem to know how to construct the arguments you want to have, you will not be getting the benefit of the doubt from me. Parent
Scary stuff. Parent
We can all sing along to the tune of: "May as well face it you're addicted to love". Oh yeah...may as well face it, etc. Parent
So -- no matter. Some see our political system as limiting, and not surprisingly, they will find themselves limited. . . . Parent
I'm pretty much sick of this saying-one-thing, doing-the-complete-opposite schtick, and then Obama not even having the balls to take responsibility for it.
Oh, he's happy to take the stage and announce the end of drilling permits for some period of time - yeah, make the people think you're on their side -just like he's done with pretty much every other major issue: health care, finance, TARP, FISA, indefinite detention, state secrets, executive orders. And looming on the horizon - Social Security and Medicare.
As far as the "other guys" are concerned, it's just Same Sh!t, Different Party - one homogenous blend of stinking doo-doo.
And that's just not good enough. Parent
or how we all have to be patient and understand the bigger picture and the balancing of interests, and incremental change and all that other crap, because I am just not having it.
So are you committing to stopping using gasoline and oil products?
No, thought so. But it sure is fun bashing the other guy...lol Parent
So are you committing to stopping using gasoline and oil products? No, thought so. But it sure is fun bashing the other guy...lol
No, thought so. But it sure is fun bashing the other guy...lol
And I'm not sure it is such a laughing blast you seem to think it is.
To transition off oil is very much a collective effort. Yes, it is individual too, but to cry individual responsibility does not mean that any oil extraction corporation or government or political party should not be held accountable. You seem to be using individual efforts to limit oil use as a way to defend Obama and BP, or to discredit anyone you disagree with. Parent
Many here rightly think this spill is horrific, yet no one seems to take any responsibility for being a supporter of big oil. Nor do many seem to care much about this as business as usual around the globe, Nigeria delta, is a horror show.
This is a wake up call as to our dependence on oil. Yet many here have made it about Obama, their favorite whipping boy. Greed and corporate profits over human safety is nothing new, and neither is our own collusion by supporting them as consumers.
Would another leader make us feel better about consuming 387 million gallons a day of gasoline? Hope not. Parent
Frankly, I think many here probably do what they can within the system to ease off oil. There have been many wake up calls - have they worked for you? What are you doing?
Less oil use will have to come down to money and many will suffer.
In the mean time your deep loyalty to a US President who's deep loyalty to a foreign oil corporation is not that inspiring.
Would another leader make us feel better about consuming 387 million gallons a day of gasoline? Hope not.
The Obama administration is doing a fine job of this. And you know that gasoline is a portion of petro products. And even for gasoline use, you may not have a car, but you sure depend on lots and lots and lots of cars - to get fertilized foods to your grocery store and favorite restaurants for one minor example. Parent
Congress is doing nothing, because we are complacent having cheap gas and oil prices, and an inflated standard of living without any reflection about what that means in the world.
Many here have made this into another Obama failure. Pretty much echoing Palin and her right wing chorus. For many the opportunity here, is not reflection about our addiction to oil, but a political opportunity to once again show that Obama is a terrible leader. Parent
Getting mired in political maneuvering is rather shameful, imo. But so be it, you have your agenda. Parent
George Bush didn't cause the hurricane that devastated the Gulf states, but he sure as hell was responsible for how the aftermath was handled; whatever blame he got was not because he was a Republican, but because he and his administration did an abominable job of handling almost every aspect of the disaster.
Sure, the right is making hay while the sun shines, but they wouldn't be able to do that with any level of credibility if Obama weren't providing them with that opportunity.
Obama's inability to get out of his comfort zone as the professorial dispassionate observer is not serving him well, and that can't be blamed on rght-wing framing or political maneuvering.
He owns this whether you want to acknowledge that or not; that's what he signed on for, it's what he, himself, keeps saying, so...it's up to him. Parent
But so be it, you have your agenda.
Fine, so you say. You seem to have the stomach for this, but I don't. You do seem to have some sort of agenda and then accuse me of some agenda which I don't even know what you are talking about. You are super into politics and that's cool dude. I'm just in a place that is sad about what is being lost.
I don't even read any of jimakappwhatever's comments. Just scroll past them. The political posturing is not interesting to me. It is NOT discourse.
Meanwhile our waters are being bloodied and polluted. I spend time with young people and children who will not care who the f is elected next November. But they will have to live with the filth we leave them. They will not care who's fault it is. BP or Obama or Bush or whoever. They will not care. But they WILL care that they are inheriting a huge effing life changing mess. Parent
But that's just some of us.
That Obama has been more interested in sending lawyers rather than engineers to the site is just more proof of what this administration is all about.
Standby for the "take over." Next stop, $8.00 gas, Parent
Environmental extremism.... I'm sure you are just parroting Palin 'extreme greenies' but if you take a moment to ponder, environmental 'extremism' is what BP is doing in the gulf right now.
More lawyers than engineers. ha! Obama has filled BPs headquarters with engineers and specialists.
8$ gas? ha! You are on a role today. Of course no one will switch to alternatives and willingly pay 8$ a gallon for gas. sheesh. Parent
As for parroting Palin I am of such an age that she is parroting me.
;-) Parent
(What am I writing? IDF put up photos of their 'evidence' and you refuse to look them up and keep telling stories about weapons.) Parent
Public transportation? In small towns that don't even have taxi service anymore because of all the government regs??
BIORN there is a country between BosNYDC and San Francisco.
And it is getting more and more unhappy with the current situation. Parent
(CNN) - The White House has ordered BP to fund Louisiana's plan to dredge up walls of sand along its coast to head off the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal announced Wednesday.
Sounds like engineers work, not lawyers.
And $8.00/gal gas would be a great thing. Maybe then American's would start to think about it's oil addiction, and it's world class position as #1 polluter. Parent
You actually want to brag about that?
Gesh.
And the fact that you don't understand that there millions of people who don't live in apartments in concrete towers who must drive to work in order to eat is normal and expected of you.
Take the A train. The rest of us don't have free rides. Parent
Interesting (for me anyway) development on the buses in NoCal since I last lived here, bus racks on the front of buses. And they are used :) Rapid transit cars also are all equipped for bikes, and they are also used. Yesterday, 3 bikers sitting next to me. None looked like a "biker" either. One was a pre-teen getting around. The key to good public transit is making it all work together. I can get anywhere throughout NoCal all on my own. And do. Everything hooks up and is scheduled together. Took just a bit of research up front.
Reducing a dependency on oil is fairly easy if you're willing to look around a bit and be not so creative. It's really more relaxing also, imo. And I'm not talking just transportation :) And just so you know, I haven't lived in a "concrete tower" in my life. I'm partial to Victorians ;) Parent
There are millions of people who get up every day, and if there jobs haven't been outsourced or destroyed by Obama's economy, must drive 30 miles or more to get to that one job that they were lucky enough to get.
Now, reduce that. The fact is that we both know that you cannot.
And welcome to the real world of real people with real lives and real probkems. Parent
Next, get ready for the left wing govt "take over", as all the dominoes fall and the grand scheme concocted by "the extremists" goes into effect..
These pinwheels actually vote..that's the worst part of this. Parent
What happens when you're a small government, pro-business conservative and your state gets pummeled by one of the worst man made disasters ever - not five years after getting pummeled by one of the worst natural disasters (Hurricane Katrina)? If you're Louisiana Senator David Vitter, you double down on offshore drilling and push for a liability cap for BP. Doubling down on drilling is not particularly surprising. Much of Louisiana's much-needed revenue comes from off-shore drilling leases. "By the same token, after every plane crash, you and I should both oppose plane travel," Vitter quipped on Sunday to CNN's Candy Crowley. "I don't think that is rational." Even Vitter's Democratic challenger, Rep. Charlie Melancon, reiterated his support for expanded drilling in the wake of the disaster..... Vitter leads Melancon comfortably in polls and he's nearly quadrupled Melcancon's $2.5 million fundraising haul. But he must now find a way to explain to angry constituents why he wants to limit the damages they might claim from the oil giant in the wake of the growing disaster - a political crack Democrats in Louisiana are looking to force open. After all, in this climate the only thing worse than being on the side of Washington is being on the side of big oil.
Doubling down on drilling is not particularly surprising. Much of Louisiana's much-needed revenue comes from off-shore drilling leases. "By the same token, after every plane crash, you and I should both oppose plane travel," Vitter quipped on Sunday to CNN's Candy Crowley. "I don't think that is rational." Even Vitter's Democratic challenger, Rep. Charlie Melancon, reiterated his support for expanded drilling in the wake of the disaster.....
Vitter leads Melancon comfortably in polls and he's nearly quadrupled Melcancon's $2.5 million fundraising haul. But he must now find a way to explain to angry constituents why he wants to limit the damages they might claim from the oil giant in the wake of the growing disaster - a political crack Democrats in Louisiana are looking to force open. After all, in this climate the only thing worse than being on the side of Washington is being on the side of big oil.
link Parent
You know what they say: It's all fun and games till somebody gets hurt. Well, the Gulf Coast is hurt, hurt in ways that may take years to fully assess, much less repair. And the sudden silence from the apostles of small government and free markets is telling. Their argument is not fundamentally wrong. Who does not believe government is frequently bloated, inefficient and bound by preposterous rules? Who does not think it is often wasteful, complex and redundant? Yes, government is not perfect. Nor is it perfectible. As adults, we should understand that. Any bureaucracy serving 309 million people and representing their interests in a world of 6.8 billion people, is likely always to have flaws. Thus, fixing government will always be an ongoing project. But instead of undertaking that project, people like Jindal rail against the very concept of government itself, selling the notion that taxation and regulation represent the evisceration of some essential American principle. They wax eloquent about what great things the free market and the free American could do if government would just get off their backs. One thinks of one's meat oozing with salmonella, one's paint filled with lead, one's car getting 12 miles to the gallon, one's self being breezily denied a job for reasons of race, creed, gender or sexual orientation and, yes, one's ocean covered from horizon to horizon with a sheen of oil. And one shudders. Government is not our enemy. Government is the imperfect embodiment of our common will. That is a not-so-fine distinction Jindal and others like him have lost in the rush to stoke the sense of grievance that burns in some conservative souls. It is a distinction they recalled with great clarity as oil began spilling on their waters. As there are no atheists in foxholes, it turns out there are no small-government disciples in massive oil spills. No, with BP oil soaking the sands of his coastline, Bobby Jindal turned righteously to that big, sometimes bloated, often intrusive federal government, and asked for help. He said: Send money, send resources. You will notice he never once said: Send less.
Their argument is not fundamentally wrong. Who does not believe government is frequently bloated, inefficient and bound by preposterous rules? Who does not think it is often wasteful, complex and redundant?
Yes, government is not perfect. Nor is it perfectible. As adults, we should understand that. Any bureaucracy serving 309 million people and representing their interests in a world of 6.8 billion people, is likely always to have flaws. Thus, fixing government will always be an ongoing project.
But instead of undertaking that project, people like Jindal rail against the very concept of government itself, selling the notion that taxation and regulation represent the evisceration of some essential American principle. They wax eloquent about what great things the free market and the free American could do if government would just get off their backs.
One thinks of one's meat oozing with salmonella, one's paint filled with lead, one's car getting 12 miles to the gallon, one's self being breezily denied a job for reasons of race, creed, gender or sexual orientation and, yes, one's ocean covered from horizon to horizon with a sheen of oil. And one shudders.
Government is not our enemy. Government is the imperfect embodiment of our common will. That is a not-so-fine distinction Jindal and others like him have lost in the rush to stoke the sense of grievance that burns in some conservative souls. It is a distinction they recalled with great clarity as oil began spilling on their waters.
As there are no atheists in foxholes, it turns out there are no small-government disciples in massive oil spills. No, with BP oil soaking the sands of his coastline, Bobby Jindal turned righteously to that big, sometimes bloated, often intrusive federal government, and asked for help. He said: Send money, send resources.
You will notice he never once said: Send less.
but the rightwing has no monopoly on misogyny - or fanaticism
PITTSBURGH -- President Barack Obama pressed Congress to scrap billions in oil company tax breaks and pass legislation to help the nation kick a dangerous "fossil fuel addiction" Wednesday, trying to channel disgust over the worsening oil disaster into a force for clean energy. Seeking opportunity in a crisis, Obama argued for action in Congress as crews struggled into a seventh week to contain BP's mangled oil well in the Gulf of Mexico. He urged lawmakers to shift the tax-break money toward clean-energy research and approve a major energy bill, now stalled in the Senate, that would slap a price on carbon emissions. "Our continued dependence on fossil fuels will jeopardize our national security," he declared. "It will smother our planet. And it will continue to put our economy and our environment at risk." "If we refuse to take into account the full cost of our fossil fuel addiction -- if we don't factor in the environmental costs and national security costs and true economic costs -- we will have missed our best chance to seize a clean energy future," he said. Obama faces serious difficulties in pushing for the bill he wants -- a shrinking legislative window in a divisive election year, the distracting nature of the oil spill crisis itself and the contentious idea of putting a price on carbon pollution.
Seeking opportunity in a crisis, Obama argued for action in Congress as crews struggled into a seventh week to contain BP's mangled oil well in the Gulf of Mexico. He urged lawmakers to shift the tax-break money toward clean-energy research and approve a major energy bill, now stalled in the Senate, that would slap a price on carbon emissions.
"Our continued dependence on fossil fuels will jeopardize our national security," he declared. "It will smother our planet. And it will continue to put our economy and our environment at risk."
"If we refuse to take into account the full cost of our fossil fuel addiction -- if we don't factor in the environmental costs and national security costs and true economic costs -- we will have missed our best chance to seize a clean energy future," he said.
Obama faces serious difficulties in pushing for the bill he wants -- a shrinking legislative window in a divisive election year, the distracting nature of the oil spill crisis itself and the contentious idea of putting a price on carbon pollution.
Yeah, until we take responsibility nothing is going to happen. It is always someone else's fault.. turn the A/C a little higher.. the giant screen teevee is generating too much heat.
turn the A/C a little higher.. the giant screen teevee is generating too much heat
but is obama still pushing clean (sic) coal? Parent
I thought new readers might be interested in what the US government--that is, the US Energy Information Administration-- has to say about future US oil production and future US renewable production. I have taken the forecast information from the Annual Energy Outlook 2010.
The interesting part is between these paragraphs at the link.
OilDrum
The EIA in its forecasts is expecting very large growth from renewables, but even with this growth, fossil fuels are expected to continue to provide the vast majority of energy supply to 2035. The "new" renewables are expected to grow rapidly, but the "old" renewables are expected to grow much more slowly. There is good reason to suspect EIA forecasts are too high, both for renewable energy and for other energy sources. The "new" renewables show very large increases. It is not clear that they are attainable. Also, if there is a conscious effort to scale back fossil fuel usage, this may reduce fossil fuel use going forward. If renewable energy sources are already estimated optimistically, total fuel use may drop by more than the forecasts would suggest.
There is good reason to suspect EIA forecasts are too high, both for renewable energy and for other energy sources. The "new" renewables show very large increases. It is not clear that they are attainable. Also, if there is a conscious effort to scale back fossil fuel usage, this may reduce fossil fuel use going forward. If renewable energy sources are already estimated optimistically, total fuel use may drop by more than the forecasts would suggest.
The infrastructure, roads, housing, agriculture, all of these are based on energy, and at present that means oil. But let's look at the term 'addiction' here. Are US citizens addicted to oil? are businesses? Only in the same way that mammals are 'addicted' to oxygen. Society in 2010 needs energy to survive in its current form.
I don't want to see a return to massive coal plants, or to firewood. The ash spill last year was enough for me to recognize, again, the unsustainability of carbon consumption.
So... what are the alternatives? Nuclear, with the generation iii reactors (at least one exists in Japan, and more are being built in China).
Solar in the future, as well as hydrogen, as well as fusion. But for now, what?
It's not as simple as saying, "quit using oil, quit driving, kill your AC and your television."
TVA has planse to bring somewhere between one and four reactors online within the next 5-10 years. I'm not thrilled by more nuclear plants, but what's the real alternative within the same timeframe?
Energy... an issue worth discussing.
that said, I will be happy to watch BP be sent into receivership.
n.b. Shallow versus deep drilling... humans can dive to the shallow depths. Might not mean much, but I would be a lot more confident if divers, as opposed to unmanned or manned submersibles, could reach the spew in the Gulf.
For me, I am thinking of driving to the Alabama gulf coast this weekend. Sort of a last visit, in case it's destroyed. I grew up spending weeks there every summer as a child. Parent
since it's not owned by BP, I wonder about the engineers. Could be that the 'business model' approach made it cheaper for BP to outsource its drilling and engineers.
Another problem with the interlocked or intercontracted corporations. Who's actually responsible? Where's the name? Parent
I'm guessing that BP owns some leases, but does BP own even the tankers they use or the refineries they operate? Parent
As millions of old folks head into their "golden years" with empty nest eggs, I wonder what "golden parachutes" await BP's executives. Parent
Of course we have been reducing our carbon usage for years and years. The auto became the current villain for the same reason smoking went out of style... People started smelling and seeing the result......
Fifty plus years ago Robert Heinlein, one of the world's greatest science fiction authors wrote TANSTAAFL.
"There Aint No Such Thing As A Free Lunch."
And there still isn't. The best near term thing I can see is hybrids. They are affordable and could almost immediately, well within 8 years, double the fleet MPG. Problem is that the country is broke and the economy is dead.
And building windmills isn't gonna fix it.
In the meantime I'm giving 8 to 5 that TVA won't get a nuke on line within 10 years.
The environmentalists won't permit it. Parent
I have been absent a while due to another battle with cancer.
This was/is my 4th time going under the knife to remove a rare form of germ cell cancer. In 1997 @ 23 I was diagnosed with germ cell cancer and had a 12 pound tumor removed from my chest along with 4 rounds of chemotherapy. I was lucky to survive that and then had 2 follow-up treatments for this disease in 2000 and 2003 which involved large surgeries and no chemo. After almost 7 years of being cancer free my wife and i (who has been there with me since 1997) where shocked to find out a few weeks ago that I had developed another tumor in my T-10 vertebrae. This type of germ cell is a rare form of testicular cancer that you are born with and my type always develops in the thoracic region or chest.
So once again I went under the knife and had the tumor removed along with the vertebrae and am now home recovering.
I hope to be back to normal in 6-8 weeks so I warn you I have a little more free time on my hands and you may see some more of my right wing/libertarian comments (drug enhanced) in the coming weeks.
I want you all to know that I have really enjoyed the opinions and debate that this wonderful site (thanks jeralyn & BTD) has enabled me to experience since I first started logging on in 2000. I really appreciate the opinions of my fellow TL bloggers and I look forward to reading your opinions, disagreeing, agreeing and commenting as I recover.
take care,
Slado
Our fingers crossed for a quick and successful recovery! Parent
Looking forward to your painkiller-fueled comments...and if your docs are holdin' out on the good sh*t you know who to call:)
Parent
Time to reflect on the blessings of one's life. Time to enjoy a crappy movie on Lifetime, time to blog, time to read and learn something new and time to spend quality moments with friends and family.
Thanks again guys. You're well wishes mean a lot. Parent
"The real question is: "Is the blockade itself lawful?'" says Douglas Guilfoyle, a specialist in international and maritime law at King's College London. "Everything else turns on that." Mr. Guilfoyle says that under the international Law of Armed Conflict a state that has legally established a blockade can enforce it by boarding vessels in international waters that it reasonably expects might breach the blockade. But a blockade itself is illegal, he says, "if it will cause excessive damage to the civilian population in relation to the military advantage gained... so therefore intercepting a vessel on the high seas to support or enforce the blockade would not be lawful.".... Israel already faces legal action at home. A group of Israeli lawyers petitioned Israel's high court hours after the operation, calling it "an act of piracy" involving hijacking, robbery, wrongful arrest, and kidnapping.
Mr. Guilfoyle says that under the international Law of Armed Conflict a state that has legally established a blockade can enforce it by boarding vessels in international waters that it reasonably expects might breach the blockade.
But a blockade itself is illegal, he says, "if it will cause excessive damage to the civilian population in relation to the military advantage gained... so therefore intercepting a vessel on the high seas to support or enforce the blockade would not be lawful."....
Israel already faces legal action at home. A group of Israeli lawyers petitioned Israel's high court hours after the operation, calling it "an act of piracy" involving hijacking, robbery, wrongful arrest, and kidnapping.
Boy did they pick the wrong crowd. This is a school that seriously knows how to fundraise. Not to mention, they are gonna have outspoken 12 year olds putting them in their place.
A formal complaint was filed against Phelps on November 8, 1977, by the Kansas State Board of Law Examiners for his conduct during a lawsuit against a court reporter named Carolene Brady. Brady had failed to have a court transcript ready for Phelps on the day he asked for it; though it did not affect the outcome of the case for which Phelps had requested the transcript, Phelps still requested $22,000 in damages from her. In the ensuing trial, Phelps called Brady to the stand, declared her a hostile witness, and then cross-examined her for nearly a week, during which he accused her of being a "slut," tried to introduce testimony from former boyfriends whom Phelps wanted to subpoena, and accused her of a variety of perverse sexual acts, ultimately reducing her to tears on the stand.[21] Phelps lost the case; according to the Kansas Supreme Court: The trial became an exhibition of a personal vendetta by Phelps against Carolene Brady. His examination was replete with repetition, badgering, innuendo, belligerence, irrelevant and immaterial matter, evidencing only a desire to hurt and destroy the defendant. The jury verdict didn't stop the onslaught of Phelps. He was not satisfied with the hurt, pain, and damage he had visited on Carolene Brady.[21] In an appeal, Phelps prepared affidavits swearing to the court that he had eight witnesses whose testimony would convince the court to rule in his favor. Brady, in turn, obtained sworn, signed affidavits from the eight people in question, all of whom said that Phelps had never contacted them and that they had no reason to testify against Brady. Phelps had committed perjury.[21]
The trial became an exhibition of a personal vendetta by Phelps against Carolene Brady. His examination was replete with repetition, badgering, innuendo, belligerence, irrelevant and immaterial matter, evidencing only a desire to hurt and destroy the defendant. The jury verdict didn't stop the onslaught of Phelps. He was not satisfied with the hurt, pain, and damage he had visited on Carolene Brady.[21]
In an appeal, Phelps prepared affidavits swearing to the court that he had eight witnesses whose testimony would convince the court to rule in his favor. Brady, in turn, obtained sworn, signed affidavits from the eight people in question, all of whom said that Phelps had never contacted them and that they had no reason to testify against Brady. Phelps had committed perjury.[21]
Wiki Parent
One woman was singing some crazy song about Obama, others were holding the typical "God hats F@gs" signs. People passing by (most who had probably never heard of this group) were just kind of shaking their heads in amazement. Parent
According to the linked article, the head of the CSI in Nebraska's largest county planted a speck of blood which was enough to keep two innocent people incarcerated for shotgunning a couple of other people to death. Only after two other people confessed to the crime were the innocents freed. The CSI guy will spend some time in prison; he could not afford an appeal bond.
And, yes, the courts are bracing for a wave of appeals from everyone who had CSI evidence in their case.
I just saw a video showing soldiers being attacked by "peace activists" with iron bar as the rappelled down from the 'copter and onto the deck.
The video was very clear. No doubt.
And speaking of yesterday, are you ready to apologize yet for shamelessly lying out your as* about those boats "delivering weapons to Gaza"? Parent
Editorial Israel and the Blockade Published: June 1, 2010
[The supporters of the Gaza-bound aid flotilla had more than humanitarian intentions. The Gaza Freedom March made its motives clear in a statement before Monday's deadly confrontation: "A violent response from Israel will breathe new life into the Palestine solidarity movement, drawing attention to the blockade."] Parent
Of course they wanted to draw attention to the blockade. They wouldn't have gone there otherwise. The fact that Israel took the bait and acted like the @ssholes that everyone expected them to be does not magically make Israel the victim here. Parent
Does it bother you at all that Gaza is ruled by Hamas, who to this day declare their #1 goal is to annihilate Israel?
How many "school supplies" could have been bought with the money that purchased 4000 rockets Hamas launched against civilian targets in Israel? Parent
"Everyone was against the elections," Dahlan says. Everyone except Bush. "Bush decided, `I need an election. I want elections in the Palestinian Authority.' Everyone is following him in the American administration, and everyone is nagging Abbas, telling him, `The president wants elections.' Fine. For what purpose?" The elections went forward as scheduled. On January 25, Hamas won 56 percent of the seats in the Legislative Council. Few inside the U.S. administration had predicted the result, and there was no contingency plan to deal with it. "I've asked why nobody saw it coming," Condoleezza Rice told reporters. "I don't know anyone who wasn't caught off guard by Hamas's strong showing." "Everyone blamed everyone else," says an official with the Department of Defense. "We sat there in the Pentagon and said, `Who the f*ck recommended this?' "... Under Bill Clinton, Dahlan says, commitments of security assistance "were always delivered, absolutely." Under Bush, he was about to discover, things were different. At the end of 2006, Dayton promised an immediate package worth $86.4 million--money that, according to a U.S. document published by Reuters on January 5, 2007, would be used to "dismantle the infrastructure of terrorism and establish law and order in the West Bank and Gaza." U.S. officials even told reporters the money would be transferred "in the coming days." The cash never arrived. "Nothing was disbursed," Dahlan says. "It was approved and it was in the news. But we received not a single penny." Any notion that the money could be transferred quickly and easily had died on Capitol Hill, where the payment was blocked by the House Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia. Its members feared that military aid to the Palestinians might end up being turned against Israel.
The elections went forward as scheduled. On January 25, Hamas won 56 percent of the seats in the Legislative Council.
Few inside the U.S. administration had predicted the result, and there was no contingency plan to deal with it. "I've asked why nobody saw it coming," Condoleezza Rice told reporters. "I don't know anyone who wasn't caught off guard by Hamas's strong showing."
"Everyone blamed everyone else," says an official with the Department of Defense. "We sat there in the Pentagon and said, `Who the f*ck recommended this?' "...
Under Bill Clinton, Dahlan says, commitments of security assistance "were always delivered, absolutely." Under Bush, he was about to discover, things were different. At the end of 2006, Dayton promised an immediate package worth $86.4 million--money that, according to a U.S. document published by Reuters on January 5, 2007, would be used to "dismantle the infrastructure of terrorism and establish law and order in the West Bank and Gaza." U.S. officials even told reporters the money would be transferred "in the coming days."
The cash never arrived. "Nothing was disbursed," Dahlan says. "It was approved and it was in the news. But we received not a single penny."
Any notion that the money could be transferred quickly and easily had died on Capitol Hill, where the payment was blocked by the House Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia. Its members feared that military aid to the Palestinians might end up being turned against Israel.
Vanity Fair
Heckofajob BushCo... fouled up once again. Some could say that BushCo support of Fatah and their failed coup was only in hope that all the Palestinians would blow each other up, and end the Palestinian problem. Parent
Rather nasty after that. Parent
Second of all, yes it bothers me.
Does it bother you at all that Israel is stopping humanitarian aid from reaching the people of Gaza - many of whom may not support Hamas? I seriously doubt they have 100% approval in Gaza. How many school children do you think are fighting for Hamas?
Does it bother you at all that Israel took out civilians on that ship? Or are some civilians more important to you than others?
All of this bothers me, I doubt you can find a single statement I've made that supports Hamas. But I'm not gonna sit back and watch misinformation being spread about "radical muslim turks sending weapons to Gaza", and I'm not gonna feel bad for Israel because they acted like @ssholes and now have to deal with the international consequences. Parent
This is akin to South-African anti-apartheid protesters who recognized that a violent response from the SA military/police would draw attention to apartheid and create support for their cause. Parent
There can be no excuse for the way that Israel completely mishandled the incident. A commando raid on the lead, Turkish-flagged ship left nine activists dead and has opened Israel to a torrent of criticism. This is a grievous, self-inflicted wound..... At this point, it should be clear that the blockade is unjust and against Israel's long-term security..... Mr. Obama needs to state clearly that the Israeli attack was unacceptable and back an impartial international investigation. The United States should also join the other permanent members of the United Nations Security Council -- Britain, France, Russia and China -- in urging Israel to permanently lift the blockade.
This is a grievous, self-inflicted wound.....
At this point, it should be clear that the blockade is unjust and against Israel's long-term security.....
Mr. Obama needs to state clearly that the Israeli attack was unacceptable and back an impartial international investigation. The United States should also join the other permanent members of the United Nations Security Council -- Britain, France, Russia and China -- in urging Israel to permanently lift the blockade.
Haaretz has a good take on the incident as well. Parent
Is it too much to ask Hamas to renounce their death sentence towards Israel and all it's inhabitants? Egypt did it, so did Jordan.
There can be peace. But not if the price is delivering the corpses of yourself, and your family, to crazed Islamists who have proven for all to see that murder, not peace, is their only goal. Parent
As far as I can tell there has been no sign of any Messiah. As grandiose as Lieberman, or Bibi, imagine themselves they do not cut it, Messiah wise. Parent
Just ask Daniel Pearl... Parent
My favorite bit of 'evidence' is the electic saw. ha! It's a friggin' grinder. Morons. Parent
The video I saw looked like concrete rebar rods cut into 3 foot lengths. A very lethal weapon. Parent
Suspect found dead in a wooded area. Police are working 30 different crime scenes.
John Bevir, a reporter for CNN affiliate ITV, described nearby Whitehaven as a sleepy seaside town. "Things like this just don't happen here," he said. "Well, they didn't, until this morning."
Gun control is so great, eh? Parent
As to whether that hit anything or not is meaningless SINCE THEY THEY DIDN'T HAVE A GUN!
So we'll never know if they could have won the Silver Cup, will we?
And unnecessary casualties? Surely you jest.
As for what police want I care not. The typical policeman/woman arrive in time to do the paper work and direct the cleanup of the blood and other bodily fluids.
And yes, I'm yelling for emphasis so don't take it personal. Parent
I think my position is logical and defensible. Parent
I say that's a fallacy, as you have no way of knowing that, or knowing that the victim would have missed and shot someone else.
It's not so black and white to say that. And you certainly can't say that it's a deterrent, when you have (possibly) a madman doing the shooting. Parent
As I said, the cops get there in time to do reports and clean up.
My original comment was correct. Per British law I say that none had a weapon to defend themselves. That's damnable at best and demonstrates a lack of caring for the safety of the citizen... or worse, a fear that the citizen make a more stringent demand on his government. Parent
Also, you have no way at all of knowing whether anyone ELSE other than the murderer had a gun; you just assume it in order to exploit a tragedy for the purposes of dropping in yet another typical American rw talking point, i.e., talk radio level drool about the Second Amendment.. Parent
My comment remains. If a person without a gun is attacked by a person with a gun it is most likely that the gunless person will die. Parent
Also, I cant help but be reminded of the way your brothers-in-arms like to snipe abortion clinics, when I read these simple-minded, Guns Save Lives arguments like yours.. Parent
Your point is mere speculation. Parent
A young Dutchman previously arrested in the 2005 disappearance of Alabama teen Natalee Holloway is the prime suspect in a weekend murder of a Peruvian woman, police said Wednesday. Joran van der Sloot is being sought in the Sunday killing of 21-year-old Stephany Flores in a Lima hotel, Criminal police chief Gen. Cesar Guardia told a news conference. He said the suspect fled the country the next day by land to Chile. The Dutch government said Interpol has issued an international arrest warrant for Van der Sloot.
Joran van der Sloot is being sought in the Sunday killing of 21-year-old Stephany Flores in a Lima hotel, Criminal police chief Gen. Cesar Guardia told a news conference. He said the suspect fled the country the next day by land to Chile.
The Dutch government said Interpol has issued an international arrest warrant for Van der Sloot.
h/t Squeaky for the easy linkie!
Btw, it's La Crosse -- also historic and lovely in parts, as one of the oldest of the many French and Metis settlements and the site of Native American settlement for thousands of years, near the sacred mound at what the French called Trempeleau. The Great River Road, especially the stretch from La Crosse to the even older Prairie du Chien, is well worth seeing. As Mark Twain said, as the man who knew the river so well, the upper Mississippi merits much less attention in literature and lore but is far more beautiful than the lower area. Parent
it is very beautiful. Parent
just like be a barefoot kid in arkansas.
vibram fivefingers