home

Pentagon Creates "Kill or Capture" List for Afghan Drug Traffickers

The U.S. is changing policy in the war against Afghan drug traffickers. A new report to be released this week by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee says the U.S. will now keep a list of wanted Afghan drug traffickers with ties to the Taliban and hunt them down with orders to capture or kill them.

Fifty Afghans believed to be drug traffickers with ties to the Taliban have been placed on a Pentagon target list to be captured or killed, reflecting a major shift in American counternarcotics strategy in Afghanistan, according to a Congressional study to be released this week.

...United States military commanders have told Congress that they are convinced that the policy is legal under the military’s rules of engagement and international law. They also said the move is an essential part of their new plan to disrupt the flow of drug money that is helping finance the Taliban insurgency.

No trial? Just shoot to kill? Wow. [More..]

What does it take to get on the list?

The generals told Senate staff members that two credible sources and substantial additional evidence were required before a trafficker was placed on the list, and only those providing support to the insurgency would be made targets.

There are now 367 people on the "kill or capture" list, including 50 traffickers the military believes gives money to the Taliban.

< Obama "Brushes Asides" Reports of Human Rights Violations in Mexican Drug War | 5th Cir. Affirms $14 Million Award to Former Death Row Inmate >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    So...if our military narcocops (5.00 / 2) (#1)
    by ruffian on Mon Aug 10, 2009 at 02:46:13 PM EST
    can shoot to kill in Afghanistan, what's to stop them in L.A.?

    "Believed to be" doesn't cut it with (5.00 / 2) (#2)
    by oculus on Mon Aug 10, 2009 at 02:48:40 PM EST
    me.  

    Throwing human rights out the window.... (5.00 / 2) (#4)
    by kdog on Mon Aug 10, 2009 at 02:55:09 PM EST
    left and right I see...boy am I glad the Republicans aren't in power anymore!

    Winning Hearts & Minds... not (5.00 / 2) (#9)
    by squeaky on Mon Aug 10, 2009 at 03:29:15 PM EST


    If they have met the criteria (5.00 / 1) (#12)
    by Militarytracy on Mon Aug 10, 2009 at 05:46:25 PM EST
    to get NATO to sign on for this, which it sounds like they have, then I'm okay with this while knowing that a dead trafficker can supply no intel so capture will be the option of choice.

    Yep (5.00 / 1) (#22)
    by AlkalineDave on Tue Aug 11, 2009 at 10:47:50 AM EST
    capture is definitely more beneficial, but if it's kill or be killed sorry it's a war, shooting happens.  What's our option?  Is it rushing in like SWAT, arresting them, and then trial?  I would think will do everything to apprehend them (for the intel), and if we can't we'll end up in a firefight which means someone will get shot.  

    Parent