home

Obama Backtracks on Progressive Civil Rights Chief

The New York Times calls out President Barack Obama for "flinching" in his choice to lead the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.

In January, Obama offered the job to well-respected civil rights lawyer Thomas Saenz of Los Angeles. Saenz had an impressive resume:

Mr. Saenz, the former top litigator in Los Angeles for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, ....was a leader of the successful fight to block California’s Proposition 187, an unconstitutional effort to deny social services and schooling to illegal immigrants. He has defended Latino day laborers who were targets of misguided local crackdowns, from illegal police stings to unconstitutional anti-solicitation ordinances.

What happened? [More...]

An editorial in Investor’s Business Daily slimed Mr. Saenz by calling him “an open-borders extremist” and said Maldef wanted to give California back to Mexico.

Apparently, Obama couldn't or wouldn't take the heat.

Mr. Saenz was ditched in favor of Maryland’s labor secretary, Thomas Perez, who has a solid record but is not as closely tied to immigrant rights.

Immigrants rights advocates are justly disappointed:

Immigrant advocates are stuck with the sinking feeling that Mr. Obama’s supposed enthusiasm for immigration reform will wilt under pressure and heat. Representative Luis Gutiérrez of Illinois, a member of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, found it sadly unsurprising that a lawyer could be rejected for the nation’s top civil-rights job because he had stood up for civil rights. “In what other position do you find that your life experience, your educational knowledge and commitment to an issue actually hurts you?” he asked.

And the $64 million dollar question: How is he going to fulfull his campaign promise of providing a path to citizenship for the 12 million undocumented residents among us if he kow-tows to the right wing extremists? As the Times says,

[Obama has] to confront and dismantle the core restrictionist argument: that being an illegal immigrant is an unpardonable crime, one that strips away fundamental protections and forgives all manner of indecent treatment.

The Constitution’s bedrock protections do not apply to just the native-born. The suffering that illegal immigrants endure — from raids to workplace exploitation to mistreatment in detention — is a civil-rights crisis. It cannot be left to fester while we wait for the big immigration bill that may or may not arrive under this president.

Mr. Saenz was a great choice. Too bad Obama caved in and didn't follow through with his nomination.

< A Place Worth Defending | Weds. Morning Open Thread >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    not to be cynical or anything, (5.00 / 2) (#1)
    by cpinva on Wed Mar 25, 2009 at 12:28:50 AM EST
    but is it possible there's another reason pres. obama dropped mr. saenz from consideration, something we maybe haven't heard about just yet? maybe something that would make it impossible for him to be confirmed, should his position require it?

    just wondering.

    What a lot of people don't get about (5.00 / 5) (#6)
    by inclusiveheart on Wed Mar 25, 2009 at 07:43:29 AM EST
    the immigration debate is that the obsession with "illegals" also puts the rights of plenty of citizens at risk.  MALDEF - Mexican American Legal Defenses and Education Fund was founded to address civil rights abuses by our government against American citizens who happened to be of Mexican descent.  Many of those families have lived in the same place for hundreds of years.  They didn't come to America - America came to them.  This fight is much bigger than simply how those who have immigrated to this country are treated under our system.  It is actually as much about citizen's rights too because all too often citizens get swept up in these programs to catch undocumented workers and in the efforts to deny them protections under the law based solely on their ethnicity.

    I understand the politics of the situation.  It is hardly an easy prospect in a time of such intense economic downturn to consider selling the American people on the idea of accepting and adopting more people when they have been so conditioned to believe that these people are "taking their jobs" or that they are "stealing government services".  But I thought Obama sold himself as a teacher and he talked at length about the team of rivals and it is disappointing that he seems to be excluding "liberal" (for lack of a better term) voices in a number of areas.  What would the harm be in having your head of the civil rights division be more intensely committed to civil rights than some others given how few people in Washington are these days?  Its just one guy in