Video.

That it was an Obama campaign staffer who asked Marc Ambinder when the press was going to start covering Bill Clinton's sex life.

That it was Obama who recycled the false smear that Hillary had a 20-year plan to power.

And if you criticize Obama on a blog say TPM or PuffObama you are attacked. As I noted earlier on a thread, a friend of mine and professor of history at Wake Forest observed:

Obama supporters have a personal relationship with their candidate. It is akin to a religious experience. He's taken on faith. Christianity too promises hope of eternal life. Obama promises hope in the here and now. And since neither Christianity nor Obama can deliver on their promises, the disappointment that inevitably will come will be brutal. They will turn on Obama.

Two years before the house purcase  Rezko's problems started to reach the newspapers.  As someone who has worked in the field, by the time it go to the papers, I would say one year before Rezko started being in default and in violation of regulatory agreements with the various government loans and programs.  The Law firm, that represented the non profit and Rezko was the same law firm, Obama's,  I lay my life on it he was getting the letters from the City showing the violations.

1.  He did not know or 2, he did not care to know.  Either is despicable.  

Some critics say that given Mr. Obama's longtime emphasis on ethics, it is puzzling that he would have been so involved with the Rezkos on the house and lot deals after questions had begun to crop up about Mr. Rezko's political and business activities.
For at least two years before the property purchases, news articles had raised questions about Mr. Rezko's influence over state appointments and contracts. There had also been reports that the F.B.I. was investigating accusations of a shakedown scheme involving a state hospital board to which Mr. Rezko had suggested appointments.

Also, Chicago officials had announced that they were investigating whether a company partly owned by Mr. Rezko had won public contracts by posing as a minority business.

 Senator Clinton has taken the same position as Senator Obama on NAFTA, albeit a bit later.  It was a political fumble on his part, but that is about it.  The Canadian envoy invited his economic analyst to an informal meeting and the Canadian government has indicated that the content of the meeting was in essence what his campaign said it was.  

 With Rezko, they appear to be on a treasure hunting expedition that isn't really leading anywhere.  Where are the allegations of impropriety?  As far as I can tell, failure to disclose the number of fundraisers he hosted for him.  I also cannot help but notice there were multiple emails sent by Senator Clinton's campaigners to the press suggesting they go on the attack on this pretty lame story.

And then this crossed the wires. A report on a rally in Beaumont, Texas:

Obama's rally in Beaumont today was the highest-energy of this Texas swing, with a crowd that was about three-quarters black cheering at almost every turn.

An interesting moment came when he was asked a question about LGBT rights and delivered an answer that seemed to suit the questioner, listing the various attributes -- race, gender, etc. -- that shouldn't trigger discrimination, to successive cheers. When he came to saying that gays and lesbians deserve equality, though, the crowd fell silent.

So he took a different tack:

"Now I'm a Christian, and I praise Jesus every Sunday," he said, to a sudden wave of noisy applause and cheers.

"I hear people saying things that I don't think are very Christian with respect to people who are gay and lesbian," he said, and the crowd seemed to come along with him this time.

The most complete video I've been able to find is unfortunately on a Fox blog.  

I don't think Obama does a terrible job, but he's clearly not used to dealing with hostile press.  He seems put out by having to do it and I'm not sure that's the more beneficial attitude to have with a press corps.

"The fact pattern remains unchanged."

I mean, most of you are basically cheering that the press hammered him over this, but almost none of you actually believe that Obama did anything wrong, or at the very least, you've presented no evidence that he did.

This election is turning into a disaster. After Hillary wins tomorrow, there'll be no clean outcome possible. Whoever comes out of this will be irrevocably damaged. I know this site is pro-Hillary and that most of you seem to think that this has been a campaign of Obama attacking Hillary, but I honestly just don't think that's true. Even when he was behind, he's pretty much had only positive ads, and the only negative ads were always response ads.

Mr. Rezko was not in trouble when Sen. Obama asked him to tour the house and give his opinion on whether it was a good property.

Rezko and Obama have been wheeling and dealing since 1991. You can ignore the facts, that doesn't make less true.

An abandoned nursing home in Woodlawn. Rezmar and the Woodlawn Preservation and Investment Corp., known as WPIC, closed on the deal in 1995. Rezmar stopped repaying the $3.6 million state loan in March 2001, and the state eventually foreclosed, taking ownership of the building earlier this yea

They put the press filing room in a men's room at a recent event.

I thought Clinton vetoed the Partial Birth Act

On November 5, 2003, President Bush signed the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act (S. 3) into law.

The Rezko affair was an unavoidable hit.  They knew it was coming.  They probably didn't expect the Clinton campaign to the ones with the pom-poms cheering on the press. In truth the press isn't really making that much of a big deal about the matter EXCEPT when Wolfson & Co. start throwing out insinuations.

The NAFTA/Canada affair was a straight hit job by the Canadian government and, if Obama does become President, he shouldn't forget it.  The Obama campaign made a mistake in the sense that they didn't think that the Canadian government would actively get into the US Presidential race. Obviously they were wrong.

As usual, the press is doing what it does.  When you show weakness they attack you.

Most people can tell that she's saying what we all know is true, during the general election McCain will be running on his experience, and everything that comes with it, Obama will continue to run on judgment and his speech from 2002.

Of course you people are so threatened by this simple observation, you've convinced yourself it's an endorsement of McCain.

She never said McCain would be a better president.

Thank goodness we have you to tell us when someone is lying.  

Im not calling them liars, the reporters are.

But as long as it helps Hillary, no biggie right?  

No, as long as it is the truth no biggie. Obama denied something that happened. The problem wasnt the meeting, it was claiming there was no meeting.

TL commenter Chisoxy  brilliantly clarifies the Obama campaign stance

Obama can beat the Repubs in November, but he wont make it that far because Clinton used the republican tricks to beat him now....thats a great line of thinking there. Im sure the republicans wouldve been nicer to him.