home

Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times

by Last Night in Little Rock

Tomorrow's NY Times has a significant article online tonight about the scapegoating of Hurricane Katrina: In Newly Released Documents, a View of the Storm After Katrina. It started as soon as the water leveled out in NOLA, and Bushinistas were already finding ways to blame everybody but themselves for the lack of preparation. No plan, except plan to shift blame. Worked with everything else to be thrown at Bush for the last five years, so why not then?

The gamesmanship and political posturing were, in a word, amazing. The greatest natural disaster in the history of the United States, maybe other than the 1906 San Francisco earthquake (see below), was a political tool or weapon in the hands of those who consider politics bloodsport without rules.

It was Thursday, Sept. 1, three days after Hurricane Katrina had ripped across the Gulf Coast. As New Orleans descended into horror, the top aides to Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco of Louisiana were certain the White House was trying to blame their boss, and they were becoming increasingly furious.

"Bush's numbers are low, and they are getting pummeled by the media for their inept response to Katrina and are actively working to make us the scapegoats," Bob Mann, Ms. Blanco's communications director, wrote in an e-mail message that afternoon, outlining plans by Washington Democrats to help turn the blame back onto President Bush.

With so much criticism being directed toward the governor, the time had come, her aides told her, to rework her performance. She had to figure out a way not only to lead the state through the most costly natural disaster in United States history, but also to emerge on top somehow in the nasty public relations war.

Katrina at least equaled the firestorm after the April 19, 1906 San Francisco earthquake may have killed as many as 4000 as noted here and the death toll was covered up for 90 years for economic and tourism reasons. (As the 100th Anniversary approaches, watch for the Discovery Channel shows. I saw one years ago that was shocking on how the destruction and death toll were covered up. Easy to do without CNN.)

We haven't changed all that much in 100 years; only the names have changed. Somethings are timeless: The lack of morals of politicians remains the same, and they apparently always were, except for the luminaries who got their act together long enough to make us a country, so characters like the Bushinistas can ruin it all.

A democracy squandered. I didn't think it was possible until a little less than four years ago.

And so it goes....

< FBI Runs Fake Candidate For Federal Office | Rove, Luskin, Novak and Fitzgerald >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#1)
    by Lww on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    Little Rock, why parade around these leftwing hacks with a byline as something they're not? Maybe objective? I googled Eric Lipton and was connected to every leftist kook website on the planet. If I linked you to some nutbag rightwinger site you'd be unappreciative.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#2)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    Please, everybody...just ignore the troll.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#3)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    The City of S.F. Museum timeline shows how the armed forces responded immediately to the earthquake and many other interesting actions. Another helpful 1906 book A Crack in the Edge of the World for the far reaching implications, including how it jumpstarted the failing Evangelical movement.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#4)
    by Ernesto Del Mundo on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    "We cannot let this get out," Mr. Mann, the communications director, wrote about Mr. Castro's offer
    Babies dying of dehydration by the dozens and these idiots are worried about a PR issue that's a relic of cold war-era politics. Partisan politics aside, this government really doesn't give a damn about its own people. That much was made obvious by the hurricane.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#5)
    by Dusty on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    The only thing that is painfully obvious about what the gov't did or didnt do after Katrina is..its total lack of compassion for human suffering. This was a catastrophy unrivaled in modern history and our current administration gave it lip service and nothing more than it had to.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#6)
    by Ernesto Del Mundo on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    Good article on the politics of disaster relief here.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#7)
    by Edger on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    Very good article, Ernesto. The final paragrapgh is rather telling: "In Florida in 2004, FEMA paid for more than 300 funerals despite the fact that hurricane-related deaths numbered slightly over 100**. In New Orleans in 2005, where the official death toll was over 1000 persons, dead bodies floated down sidewalks and streets, left to rot wherever they had drifted after the waters began to recede. Rowboat federalism indeed" **emphasis mine

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#8)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    Dusty: I gotta ask. How should the three gov'ts (fed, state and local) shown compassion for human suffering? Worn sackcloth and ashes in recognition? Or just gotten on with the job of relief? Would that make you feel better? I flew missions down into Hurricanes Katrina and Rita areas to deliver supplies and just got back from a month in the ME flying supplies into Islamabad for the Earthquake relief. I would judge that the Earthquake easily rivaled the Hurricanes. And I would say the Tsunami tops them all. You may have overloked them.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#9)
    by BigTex on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:39 PM EST
    The irony here is astounding. Has anyone condiered two salient points? First, the magnitude of damage with Katrina compared to other hurricanes? Second, how the victims of Katrina acted in compairson to how the victms of how Rita acted? Both of those are two telling criteria that need to be examined. Having been on the front lines helping Katrina evacuees in a decontamination and supply center in Texas, then having been one of those hit by Rita, the differences are astounding. But in the closed minded quest to bash the administration those factors aren't even considered. Not to say that FEMA acted perfectly, but their actions and the actions of the critics are indistinguishable. Critics care more about making political points rahter than getting to the root of the problem. It equally disgusting.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#10)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:39 PM EST
    Last Night writes:
    Katrina at least equaled the firestorm after the April 19, 1906 San Francisco earthquake may have killed as many as 4000 as noted here and the death toll was covered up for 90 years for economic and tourism reasons.
    First, are you saying that the government is covering uo 4000 deaths? If so, what proof do you have besides an inacurate comparsion to the SF earthquake? I'm LOL.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#11)
    by Ernesto Del Mundo on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:39 PM EST
    getting to the root of the problem.
    Which is what, Tex?

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#12)
    by BigTex on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:39 PM EST
    Several problems: 1) Is FEMA prepared to handle one of the "disaster scenarios?" The disaster scenario's are special disasters that can happen that will result in more damage than run of the mill disasters. Katrina was one. A lahar/pyroclastic flow into Seattle or Portland is another. The "big one" directly under SF or LA. From what it seems, FEMA was simply not capable of dealing with the heightned level of damage and need from the storm in NO. They did okay