home

Booker Update

by TChris

Those who have followed the Booker case know that the Supreme Court made the federal sentencing guidelines advisory, freeing federal judges to impose sentences that are less (or, unfortunately, more) harsh than the guidelines formerly required. (Those who haven’t followed the case can catch up here.)

The Court’s decision will benefit some defendants, but – you heard it here first – it didn’t benefit Booker, who was resentenced today to a term of 30 years, the same sentence that the district court originally imposed. Booker’s counsel, who happens to be writing this, was disappointed, to say the least.

< Architect Urges Boycott of Prison Construction | Taser Death in Phoenix >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Booker Update (none / 0) (#1)
    by Mreddieb on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:58:42 PM EST
    I think these issues should not go back to the presiding judge for resentencing for the obvious reason. There is, in my opinion, a matter of ego and a judicial F*** You to the appeals Court from the presiding Judge. The same thing happened to the plaintiffs in the Agent Orange suit which I was part of. The Supreme Court over ruled the judges decision and sent it back to him to re-consider and he Threw it out again! end of story. So those of us who were effected and crippled by agent Orange and weren't included in the original suit because we didn't no we were sick are sh*t out of luck. I guess yo