home

Fatal High Speed Chase Didn't Violate Flawed Policy

When a policy that is "properly followed" ends in the death of an innocent teenage girl and her 9 year old sister, it's time to change the policy.

Franklinton Police Chief Ray Gilliam said Sunday afternoon policy was properly followed in a high-speed police chase and crash that killed three people. ... Franklinton police officer Michael Dunlap observed Guy Christopher Ayscue, 38, of Henderson, driving very erratically in a Pontiac, according to police. Dunlap tried to stop Ayscue using his lights and siren, but Ayscue drove off, and Dunlap pursued.

Dunlop chased Ayscue for 13 miles. Three times during the chase, Dunlop saw Ayscue enter a lane of oncoming traffic, but Dunlop continued the high speed pursuit. That judgment may not have violated a flawed departmental policy, but Dunlop was foolish to give Ayscue an incentive to drive faster.

Ayscue was traveling north on U.S. Highway 15 and went to pass another vehicle in a no-passing zone when he hit a 1999 Kia head-on, Gilliam said. ... It is estimated that Ayscue was traveling at 90 mph at the time of the crash.

< The Death Penalty Is About Right and Wrong | Waxman Requests Plame Documents >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Chaseing (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by sedipple on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 08:45:30 AM EST
    First post sounds like the Police.

    I know personally of (5.00 / 2) (#6)
    by Lora on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 08:55:39 AM EST
    Two needless deaths and one close call from high-speed chases in which the people fleeing from police had committed something quite petty.  Illegal, yes, but nothing meriting a death sentence.

    I say, catch 'em later.  I'd rather risk a potential future accidental death from not chasing at high speed, than increase the odds of an immediate accidental death by chasing at high speed.

    How does the police know (none / 0) (#7)
    by jimakaPPJ on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 09:50:27 AM EST
    that the auto trying to escape doesn't have an unreported kidnap victim tied up and tossed in the trunk?

    A murdered body in the trunk?? Leaving the scene of an unreported robbery??

    etc., etc, etc.

    What you have is 20-20 hindsight. Something that we all suffer from. But... fleeing is a clear indication that the person trying to escape has committed a crime. The crime is unknown.

    The person who killed was the driver. Not the police.


    Parent

    Gee... (5.00 / 0) (#10)
    by Lora on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 03:40:13 PM EST
    Anyone could have a body in the trunk and be perfectly law-abiding on the outside.  Perhaps we should perform random traffic stops and check people's trunks for bodies.  Foresight, you know.

    In any case, the poor person in the trunk would be a lot safer if they didn't crash and burn in a high-speed car chase.

    Parent

    What logic. (1.00 / 0) (#12)
    by jimakaPPJ on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 06:17:00 PM EST
    So because of that we should ignore people who try and escape??

    Parent
    Logic, indeed! (5.00 / 0) (#13)
    by Lora on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 06:31:28 PM EST
    So because of that we should ignore people who try and escape??

    Now, did I say that?  reads<