Comment Ratings by rdandrea |
|
|
1) oh, ok. [3.00], by byteb, Rated: 1 Posted on 09/14/2008 11:52:51 AM EST Rated on 09/14/2008 02:28:29 PM EST
2) Don't care about the consensus on this blog [4.00], by wasabi, Rated: 1
3) Holy Moly! [1.00], by Josey, Rated: 1
4) Here's how you don't fall into that [5.00], by txpolitico67, Rated: 5
5) Ok, explain: [5.00], by eustiscg, Rated: 5
6) And [3.28], by tek, Rated: 1
7) I agree with your comment about [4.00], by zfran, Rated: 1
8) Gimme a break [5.00], by eustiscg, Rated: 5
9) Oh bejebus [1.00], by MichaelGale, Rated: 1
10) You could hear a pin drop [1.00], by Desired User Name, Rated: 1
11) That cash advantage didn't help [4.38], by myiq2xu, Rated: 1
12) I think the campaign has been great thus far [4.50], by samtaylor2, Rated: 5
13) It's not the Obama [5.00], by DCDemocrat, Rated: 5
14) Obama's VP texting elitist & exclusionary IMO [4.00], by Saul, Rated: 1
15) They would have been softballs [4.50], by Grace, Rated: 1
16) You hit [3.66], by tek, Rated: 1
17) Amazing [4.00], by TruthSayer, Rated: 1
18) Though Perhaps [5.00], by The Maven, Rated: 5
19) he could get 99.9% [4.20], by Capt Howdy, Rated: 1
20) Save the death penalty! [4.20], by Steve M, Rated: 1
21) Or it could mean... [4.20], by Truth Sayer, Rated: 1
22) One of them called the other night [4.00], by echinopsia, Rated: 1
23) Potential Name Conflicts [4.00], by blogtopus, Rated: 1
24) Seems strange [1.00], by jimakaPPJ, Rated: 1
25) Yes, that's correct. Obama has removed [3.66], by MarkL, Rated: 1
26) Do you think Obama's campaign will [3.60], by MarkL, Rated: 1
27) Suppose Obama is down 5-10 when the [3.66], by MarkL, Rated: 1
28) Then better not vote for Obama [3.66], by gyrfalcon, Rated: 1
29) Bold Statement [4.20], by JimWash08, Rated: 1
30) In my experience [4.60], by Steve M, Rated: 1 |
|









