Child Soldier Omar Khadr Pleads Guilty at Guantanamo

Child soldier Omar Khadr pleaded guilty today in his military commission trial at Guantanamo.

Mr. Khadr agreed to plead guilty “in exchange for the Canadian government agreeing to repatriate him back to Canada after one year,” said his Canadian lawyer Dennis Edney...

The Harper government, despite its strident denials and years of refusing to intervene, endorsed the deal and made an exchange of diplomatic notes with Washington that should pave the way for Mr. Khadr to serve the remainder of his sentence in Canada, beginning next fall.

A jury will now recommend a sentence length for Khadr, but it only matters if it is less than the 8 years he agreed to in the plea agreement.

The details are sealed for now, but should be disclosed after the jury renders its verdict. Human rights groups quickly assailed the deal as unfair to Khadr: [More...]

“For the U.S. government, the guilty plea was a way to save face,” said Daphne Eviatar, an observer for Human Rights First. “After all, the Obama administration knew that it was a political embarrassment for its first military commission trial to be of a child soldier.”

Human Rights First issued a press release stating Khadr's sentence should take into account his juvenile status.

While child offenders may be prosecuted for war crimes, the US has failed throughout Khadr's detention to afford him the protections provided to children under international law. Under the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (Optional Protocol), which the United States ratified in 2002, the US is obligated to recognize the special situation of children who have been recruited or used in armed conflict.

The Optional Protocol requires the rehabilitation of former child soldiers within a state party's jurisdiction, mandating that states provide "all appropriate assistance for their physical and psychological recovery and their social reintegration." Under the Convention on the Rights of the Child, to which the US is a signatory, governments should ensure that the imprisonment of a child offender "shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time."

From the ACLU:

Despite today's good news that a trial has been averted, Khadr's case is emblematic of a set of fundamental flaws of the military commissions that won't be resolved by a plea deal. These tribunals are simply incapable of providing fair trials, and they ought to be shut down altogether. Individuals accused of terrorism-related crimes should be prosecuted in federal courts. Those courts have shown over and over again that they are capable of delivering results that are both legitimate and seen as legitimate.
< ACLU Writes AG Holder to Back Off on Prop 19 | Michigan Judge Sentences 15 Year Old to Life Without Parole >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

  • Display: Sort:
    On This Matter, Everyone in the Chain of Command (none / 0) (#1)
    by msaroff on Mon Oct 25, 2010 at 10:51:54 PM EST
    Is a war criminal, up to and including the C-in-C, Barack Obama.

    This has been a disgraceful affront to the basic norms of decency,.

    mistake in retrospect (none / 0) (#2)
    by diogenes on Mon Oct 25, 2010 at 11:03:51 PM EST
    In retrospect, Bush really should not have panicked; if he deemed the Al Qaida detainees to be "soldiers" afforded Geneva convention rights, the left would have applauded his enlightenment because there would have been more outside visits to Gitmo and better treatment and, mainly, none of the prisoners would have the right to anything resembling a trial or a release date.
    Of course this kid isn't guilty of terrorism in the criminal law in federal court sense, but catching and releasing enemy combatants only means that they will return to the fight as long as the war continues.  The policy on rehabbing child soldiers is geared towards the victor, and there is no victor as yet in the US/Al Qaida war.

    Unrealistic (none / 0) (#3)
    by Harry Saxon on Tue Oct 26, 2010 at 08:39:51 AM EST

    none of the prisoners would have the right to anything resembling a trial or a release date.

    Actually, he would've been better off demonstrating that even terrorism couldn't affect American Justice, but that boat set sail a long time ago.