home

Individualism and Responsibility

"I keep hearing about how employment is getting so bad. If people would just look hard enough, there are jobs out there, and if they can't find one for some reason, they should make their own."

The above couple of sentences were uttered by one of my family members last week, after hearing on the news that unemployment had risen to 9.4% for the month of May. Ignoring at first whether or not the assertion is valid (it most certainly isn't), the thing that struck me the most was the logical default to a notion that "In America, if you try hard enough, you can make it."

This particular ideological premise grew stronger and stronger over the 20th Century, as America solidified itself as an economic powerhouse, a beacon of industrialization, and a military dynamo. In the 1980s, after the rebirth of American conservativism and individualism, these refrains grew louder and louder. America was a country, we all wanted and want to believe, where anyone could pull themselves up by their bootstraps, if they just tried hard enough, and if they were responsible and made good decisions.

Unfortunately, this overzealousness about the power of the individual has created some rather devastating psychological and physical consequences for our nation. When people need help, they are often told not to seek it, but instead to grit up, bear their problem, and find their own way through. If a person is going through depression, or is suicidal, they often do not seek medical help, because doing so has a certain stigma on it. Going to see a psychologist implies that one is not in control of themselves, and therefore, not trying hard enough to live up to this American ideal of reliance on self.

We see the manifestations of this overemphasis on the power of the individual in our policymaking as well. Take universal health care, or universal insurance. How many times have we heard the refrain: "If someone really wants health insurance, they'll find a way to get it." Or with alcoholics: "If they really want to quit, they can will themselves through it." Homeless? You obviously haven't tried hard enough to find a place to live. Are you divorced? You obviously didn't try hard enough to save your marriage.

So goes the logic of those in our country who are obsessed with feeling 'in control' of their everyday surroundings. And in the end, that's the overall problem. As a nation who has persevered and brought ourselves through so much by constantly attacking problems and building our standing up, we hate the idea that we might not be in control of everything that we face. We don't like to think that there are problems we have that we cannot solve. And the longer we have this fear of being controlled by external circumstances, the longer that we do a disservice to our fellow Americans who really do need help. There really are people who can't do it on their own, regardless of whatever government program they may or may not qualify for. Sometimes, people really do need assistance. Welfare shouldn't have the stigma that it does. People should be able to see a therapist without fearing that those around them will shun them and think poorly of them.

We are gearing up for a major debate on health care reform this week. Despite of whether or not Obama's plan is or is not what we on this site may want it to be, or whether or not some Americans think a public plan is a good idea or not, one thing is certain: we must change our mindset about seeking help as a nation, one person at a time. Otherwise, we will find ourselves in a precarious situation where there really are two Americas, as John Edwards has routinely spoken about. Not just one in poverty, and one ignorant of it, but one America who is reaching, crying out for help, and another America who is too scared to  not be the unconditionally independent brute to help.

< "We could not understand what he was saying." | You'll Never Get Ahead ...With Torture on the Resume >
  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Couldn't agree more (none / 0) (#1)
    by Xavier on Sat Jun 06, 2009 at 11:40:41 PM EST
    I think that one of the saddest ramifications of the "unconditionally independent" mentality is that if people in this country generally did look to one another for help rather than just attempt to sort things out themselves we would find ourselves in a far better position. There are a tremendous number of organisations here who would love nothing better than to help others with various problems, but as seeking assistance still holds a stigma many refuse to ask in the first place for fear of being seen as "weak."

    Overall our country would be in a much better state if we lost the self-righteous attitude and stopped condescending towards those commonly regarded as the failures of society. Such behaviour makes it impossibly difficult for those individuals to ever improve their circumstances.

    Yet... (none / 0) (#2)
    by kdog on Wed Jun 10, 2009 at 09:34:34 AM EST
    I can understand that the universe is chaos, and we are all left hanging on the whims of fate and luck and circumstance, whle at the same time understanding that no one is in a better position to help me than me.  Ultimately it is my responsibility to ensure my existence...this is natural law.

    I agree there should be no shame attached in asking for or needing a helping hand, everybody needs help sometimes.  But there is shame in taking help while not doing all in your power to help yourself...that's just another con.  

    Take the bailout banks for example...they took all this government help while ignoring their own behavior and the role it played in them going bust-o (assuming they really are/were bust-o and it wasn't a confidence scam).  It wasn't all bad luck.  If they keep doing what they've been doing, and need bailout after bailout, we'd be foolish to give it to them. The same applies to individuals..bad luck and/or ya f*cked up and ya need a hand once, that's cool.  Twice or three times after making the same mistakes all over again, you're pushing it.

    Every man for himself ain't pleasant, but either is a welfare state where you're totally dependent on society to sustain your existence..there has gotta be a happy medium somewhere.  Total responibility for yourself and limited responsibility for your fellow man, if you will.