home

Declaring Victory

UPI editor Martin Sieff displays a surprising amount of journalistic honesty when he writes:

The cynical old adage about Vietnam is being played out in Iraq: Pull out the troops and call it victory.

That is certainly one way to look at President George W. Bush's decision, to be announced Tuesday, to pull 8,000 U.S. troops out of Iraq.

As Sieff points out, the current level of troop commitment would be unsustainable even if Iraq's nascent government hadn't insisted on a troop withdrawal. His verdict: [more ...]

Bush's withdrawal decision is, therefore, a late, grudging and small concession to a series of unpleasant realities he has refused to admit for too long. It certainly is not a fundamental reassessment of U.S. policy in Iraq, though it makes such a reassessment inevitable. As with his belated but radical move to turn the two mortgage-lending giants of the United States virtually into public utilities, Bush will leave his successor to try to make sense of the conflicting and chaotic policies he leaves behind him.

The troop withdrawal will not happen quickly if the president's plan is implemented. That means the next president will be left to decide whether the pace of withdrawal should hasten.

A Marine battalion of about 1,000 will come home in November, the president said, but not until February 2009 -- after he has left office -- will more forces start withdrawing: An Army brigade of about 4,000 will leave then, along with about 3,400 combat support forces - military police, construction engineers and the like.

Barack Obama is proposing the withdrawal of two brigades per month, subject to existing circumstances. John McCain, on the other hand, wants nothing short of victory, whatever that might mean. Meanwhile, the number of American military members who have died in Iraq has increased to 4,155.

< What Are The Duties Of Media Critics? | Quality "Journamalism" >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    While I agree with troop withdrawal in Iraq (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by haner on Tue Sep 09, 2008 at 11:15:22 AM EST
    I'm not so gungho about Obama's wardrums on Afghanistan.

    And I'm not inclined to trust Obama's promise of 2 brigates per month given the precedent of FISA, public campaign financing, and drilling.

    The Blue Dogs will win (none / 0) (#4)
    by mmc9431 on Tue Sep 09, 2008 at 02:35:28 PM EST
    (You can add the 527's to the list. Now they're OK). I think Democrat's have been so whipped over being weak that they may end up even more aggressive than Republican's. His rhetoric doesn't leave me to believe he's the anti war candidate of the primaries. I'd feel a lot more reassured if I knew who he had in mind for his cabinet.

    Parent
    More important (none / 0) (#5)
    by cal1942 on Tue Sep 09, 2008 at 02:58:32 PM EST
    than the cabinet; who will he appoint to the White House staff, who will he appoint to Mgt & Budget, who will be his economic advisors, etc.

    For actual influence, the cabinet ain't what it used to be.

    Parent

    Also (none / 0) (#6)
    by cal1942 on Tue Sep 09, 2008 at 03:02:03 PM EST
    I'm not too thrilled with this:

    withdrawal of two brigades per month, subject to existing circumstances

    What existing circumstances are we talking about?

    Parent

    So we'll have 8000 toops less in February (none / 0) (#3)
    by wasabi on Tue Sep 09, 2008 at 12:51:57 PM EST
    This is still about 20K more than we had prior to the surge.