For instance, you write; "Wright is disturbing and I would not want him to have the ear of an American president. "  Didn't Wright have the ear of Bill & Hillary Clinton during the Monica incident of national disgrace.  Do you think for one minute that Wright's views on America's historical events were any different then than they were at the time of his sermon.  How many of you have listened to the entirety of the lecture?

Unfortunately, the typical white person knows absolutely nothing about the culture or thoughts of African Americans.  When's the last time you visited a black family's home or hung out in the hood?  Ask yourselves the question what and how do African Americans think?  You're totally inept to what we think or speak in our circles and those circles are as diverse as this country.  Barack is reflective of this.  Case in point that Blacks folks are cut from the same cloth.  What is definitive to Whites carries a total opposite meaning to Blacks.  We speak an entirely different language regardless how flent we are in English jurisprudence.  Why?  Because of our life's DIFFERENCES NOT DEFICIENCIES.

Unlike our white counterparts Wright's words were not out of character.  The problem with the AIDS allegation is that it's not been proven....YET!  Given African-Americans experiences with this country and its government it's no wonder they are suspect in that crack cocaine and AIDS came on the scene simultaneously, both having devastaging and disproportionate effects on the African-American population.  You cannot dismiss 400 years of slavery and it's antithetical impact to what is generally accepted as the norm, on Blacks in this country.  Jeremiah Wright is of the first generation out from Jim Crow.  His parents were slaves.  It's no wonder that his views of America, as the result of first hand experience, probably long before you were born, are bitter real.  As children and grandchildren of Rev. Wright's generation we too have our ideas and conspiracy theories about the AIDS infestation and disproportionate effect on Black peoples globally.  

Fortunately, we've etched out just enough from that era to weigh the variables and place them in the balances according to their significance.  Just enough time has expired that Barack's generation and the future will expand the scope of our history from an intellectual perspective which is allowing us to spring forth from residual effects of slavery that continues to confine us to America and maintain a disconnect from the global community.

You further state, Since Obama has no experience, we really don't know how much he agrees with Wright and maybe even Farrakhan.  I bet Michelle Obama does.  She seems to have the same not so patriotic feeling about America.

Are you therefore indicating that the millions of people who have rallied around Obama are anti patriotic?  It is this type of slanderous speak that widens the divide between Blacks and Whites in this country.  How can someone who has lived in a single parent environment being bi-racial and exposed to every culture except his indigenous peoples be inexperienced?  Please explain that for me.  I suggest that among the 3 candidates Obama is the most experienced in dealing with the realities of life.  Afterall the Clintons earned 114 million dollars over an 8 yr. period and has never known the challenges of isolation.  John McCain married into ultra wealth and has been a kept man for the past 27 years not only by his wife's money but at the behest of the taxpayers.  Before McCain/Feingold there's minimal legislation that contributed to McCain. Yet, suddenly McCain is the everso compassionate one.  His so-called HOME program is nothing more than HUD's existing HOME program which will be gutted as the income caps rise to accommodate the greed of higher income borrowers and their BIGGER is BETTER mentality.  

Min. Farrakan has emphasized over and over that his opposition is to Zionism not the Jewish people.  AIPAC's influence over US foriegn policy is clear indication of the Min.'s stance on this issue.

You state that, "America has done some stupid things but we are much better now and that should be celebrated, not only if one's husband was running for president."

Stupid things.  Your minimalization of 400 yrs. of slavery is distestable and further defines your total ineptness to what matters to African American who are descendants of former slaves.  You minimize the fact that a people were brought to this country against their will, stripped of all visages of their history, culture, language land, and God.  A people who faced one of the greatest humanitarian tragedies in recent history including genocide and miseducation.

Forty short years is miniscule since the passage of the Civil Rights Act to right the wrongs done to the African American peoples in this country.  The good thing that has evolved from this primary election is the America's and the Democratic Party and so-called Liberals/Progressives true colors.

Should Obama not win this primary the change has already taken place.  The hour is ripe for a falling away from the so-called Democratic Party and start anew.

Lastly, your statement, Obama just this second said, I think people find me trustworthy, more than the other candidate.  I think he needs to be buried for the that!

What you're really saying is that the millions of people polled who statistically ranked Obama as more trustworthy than Hillary needs to be buried.  The American made this acclaimation,  Barack simply repeated the findings.