Oh, that's all he has to do. And it's a pro-Obama essay! [ Parent ]
This is what got to me: Clinton said in her victory speech on Tuesday night that no Democrat has won the White House since 1916 without taking West Virginia. True. But they all could have won without it. The margins of victory in those races ranged from 23 to 515 electoral votes. West Virginia has five.
Iirc, if Al Gore had carried WV, we'd be talking about VP Lieberman's election campaign right 'bout now. (OK, fine, sometimes things aren't perfect... Hee). [ Parent ]
The electoral votes of the other heavily Appalachian states could be offset. For instance, if he wins Virginia (where a corner sits in Appalachia and which seems to be in play although it hasn't swung Democratic in more than 40 years) and Florida (which almost swung -- or maybe did swing -- Democratic in 2000) . . .
Uh, have they forgotten that lil' issue down in the sunshine state? AKA, we kinda said they didn't count . . . [ Parent ]
With Hillary running she could get those voters. [ Parent ]
Obama has proclaimed "change" his mantra. That change may well be evident in the electoral map come fall. Appalachia is all American, but America is not all Appalachian.
Obama "won" by focusing on undemocratic caucuses and red states with high delegate counts - and expects the Clintons to persuade Dems in FL, OH, PA, TX, WV, KY, etc to vote for Obama in the general.
Oh- and now we learn from Ed Gillespie, Bush's remarks weren't directed specifically to Obama or even Carter although Carter would be a better fit. But Obama did what he accused Bush of doing - inserting politics into foreign policy. Obama used Bush's remarks to say, "Look at me! Look at me! I'm the Dem nominee!"
And Obama used Bush's words for a 2nd day news cycle to boost his "toughness" on foreign policy. sheeeeesh [ Parent ]
Make a new account