home
NYT Editorial (5.00 / 1) (#8)
by cal1942 on Sun Apr 06, 2008 at 11:59:29 AM EST
explains nothing.  We're always told that free trade is good. End of story. There were some interesting statements in the editorial.  This one stands out:

"Immigration reform would most likely top Mexico's list."

What would those 'reforms' contain.  The last thing that Mexico's ruling class wants is for their impoverished citizens to remain in the country to cause an uncomfortable political situation.  Agricultural exceptions in NAFTA have put many Mexican farmers out of business driving many people into enough desperation to leave their homes and emigrate north. One of the accomplishments is that we are guaranteeing that Mexican governments will be either right or farther right.

While I agree that universal health care is needed as well as improved unemployment insurance it's also interesting that the Times admits that workers have to take lower paying jobs.  Jobs I might point out that often pay as little as one third as much.  That's only part of what explodes the whole argument in favor of free trade.

Without the space to write a full discussion of free trade it should be pointed out that the loss of manufacturing jobs does grievous harm to many communities.  When communities are damaged the social fabric can torn beyond repair.  The continued loss of manufacturing base is not in the short or long term interests of the nation.  A skill not practiced is a skill lost.

Living in an industrial state is like having a front row seat at a Greek tragedy.  The investment in human capital that the Times and other supporters of free trade like to talk about is never accompanyed with a specifio "what.'  "Lifelong education" to learn to do WHAT? Retraining a 50 or 55 year old worker whose job has been outsourced to do WHAT?   Empty bedpans?

Selective Misrepresentation (none / 0) (#13)
by squeaky on Sun Apr 06, 2008 at 12:31:00 PM EST
Of the Times Editorial, is a dishonest way to champion your protectivist ideology.

The Times has offered progressive solutions to offset free trade. To characterize their position as right wing doesn't lend credence to your oft repeated bedpan analogy.

It seems clear that the Pols are acting like pols here, both Clinton and Obama are pandering just like GW did in West Virginia. Hopefully they will adopt some of the suggestions of the Times editorial when one of them takes the baton.

[ Parent ]

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft