home
Certainly he's referring to Sullivan. . . (5.00 / 1) (#3)
by LarryInNYC on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 09:41:16 AM EST
he just may not know it.

I am happy to no longer read him (none / 0) (#6)
by andgarden on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 09:45:02 AM EST
Don't know why I started, frankly.

[ Parent ]
Atrios? (none / 0) (#10)
by JoeA on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 09:52:55 AM EST
You are going to boycot his blog because he hasn't attacked Andrew Sullivan to your satisfaction?  Beyond parody.

[ Parent ]
I think (5.00 / 1) (#15)
by Capt Howdy on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 09:56:18 AM EST
one of us is having trouble following the thread.

[ Parent ]
Heh, so presumably he means Sullivan then? (5.00 / 1) (#34)
by JoeA on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 10:04:54 AM EST
Fair enough.  He has certainly espoused enough offensive views to justify not reading him  :-)

[ Parent ]
Indeed (5.00 / 1) (#23)
by Big Tent Democrat on Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 10:00:10 AM EST
you are truly beyond parody.

[ Parent ]

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft