home
NYTimes Jumps the Gun: Does Not Wait For The Votes | 88 comments (88 topical)

Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment

Sounds like Frank Rich wrote that editorial n/t (5.00 / 7) (#1)
by imhotep on Tue Apr 22, 2008 at 10:33:56 PM EST


Yeah, I'd like to know (5.00 / 1) (#29)
by BrandingIron on Tue Apr 22, 2008 at 10:46:17 PM EST
who wrote that crap.

[ Parent ]
The same guy who wrote (5.00 / 3) (#52)
by myiq2xu on Tue Apr 22, 2008 at 11:12:26 PM EST
DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN

[ Parent ]
Indeed (5.00 / 2) (#66)
by cal1942 on Tue Apr 22, 2008 at 11:34:31 PM EST
So according to the New York Times any Clinton victory is inconclusive.  That was the logic of that editorial.

And if it wasn't by 20 points after Obama outspent her at least 2 to 1 and by 4 to 1 on the last weekend along with Obama's shameful 'Democrat for a day" registration drive; it was a loss by gosh.

Orwell speak from the Fools For Scandal (Gene Lyons). Up is down, winning is losing, war is peace. Negative Obama ads attacking Clinton's UHC plan and all his other filth is positive.

The Times again demonstrates its intellectual incompetence. The stupid really burns.

[ Parent ]

dammit! (5.00 / 1) (#68)
by cpinva on Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 12:08:07 AM EST
DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN

beat me to it! :)

[ Parent ]

NYTimes Jumps the Gun: Does Not Wait For The Votes | 88 comments (88 topical)

Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft