home
This argument is so lame (none / 0) (#186)
by Deadalus on Thu Apr 10, 2008 at 09:05:21 PM EST
Barack can't win because he's bi-racial.  That's what it boils down to.  Despite the fact that polls this far out historically are insignificant and totally inadequate in predicting elections.

Furthermore, macro-trends tend to determine elections and regardless of the mud (which gets slung every year, mind you, and will be slung at Hillary as well), the Republicans have the worst set of circumstances possible from a historical perspective.

And if you think Barack's amazing victory in Wisconsin was the result of cross-over meddling, you're nuts.  That margin was too wide for any Republican mischief to have pulled off.  

[ Parent ]
Not so (none / 0) (#204)
by Virginian on Thu Apr 10, 2008 at 09:19:16 PM EST
the Republicans have the worst set of circumstances possible from a historical perspective.

They have a very real shot at winning

[ Parent ]

Doubtful (none / 0) (#207)
by Deadalus on Thu Apr 10, 2008 at 09:22:10 PM EST
But Hillary doesn't do any better in head-to-heads at this point.  As  "electability" is the argument of the week from camp Hillary, I'm sure we'll hear plenty about it in the coming weeks.  

[ Parent ]

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft