Don't misunderstand, I know polls mean nothing this far out, and many of the new polls aren't in critical states, but I don't think we can say BO is any worse than HRC. I've heard a couple dozen interviews with the "blue collar and older/white" supporters of HRC in Ohio and Pennsylvania. A large percentage of these folks choose HRC because they think Bill will help out. Yes, this is anecdotal--NPR's sampling. But, I would not be shocked if these type of voters went with BO if 1) they were predisposed to the D Party, and 2) BO had a VP that made them comfortable. They seem to take comfort in Bill, it seems reasonable that they could do the same with a VP (of course, HRC as VP may be problematic.) Again I know these interviews aren't a scientific sample, so load up on salt, but this far out everything is speculation.
New Jersey - Obama performs 6 points better than Clinton Washington - Obama performs 8 points better than Clinton Michigan - Obama performs 2 points better than Clinton Virginia - Obama performs 11 points better than Clinton Wisconsin - Obama performs 9 points better than Clinton Oregon - Obama performs 12 points better than Clinton Connecticut - Obama performs 14 points better than Clinton California - Obama performs 6 points better than Clinton Missouri - Clinton performs 6 points better than Obama North Carolina - Obama performs 5 points better than Clinton Nevada - Obama performs 5 points better than Clinton [ Parent ]
And Ky which is May 20th she is 58 to 28 in the polls, Senator Clinton is the voters choice when their votes count. [ Parent ]
Make a new account