Duh.  But you're making a straw argument with "pretending".

And your "in reality" is just a random opinion - that and backing it with some data or logical argument will get your post not banned.

Just like Hillary.

You ought to think about why they don't -- and they won't.  Too many unknown unknowns with your candidate, including his delegate count.  It's the downside of the caucus exploitation strategy.

The caucus states must keep recaucusing, starting over at every stage, from now until June.  None of those local delegates is bound and can flip any time at the county and state levels, until the national delegates in those states finally are selected.

With the revelations of recent weeks about your candidate, a lot could change.  That campaign said that a massive number of super-delegates was going to declare for him a couple of weeks ago . . . but then the revelations began, and that became only a "rumor" . . . and the super-d commitments slowed to a trickle ever since.