home
I dunno (5.00 / 1) (#23)
by Big Tent Democrat on Thu Mar 27, 2008 at 01:20:21 PM EST
I am convinced Pelosi lacks it though.

[ Parent ]
I (none / 0) (#70)
by Claw on Thu Mar 27, 2008 at 01:36:53 PM EST
Think they WANT to win but they're sure making it look like they don't.  Dean has been bad, Pelosi perhaps even worse.  If it does come down to Clinton as the nominee, I really would like her to have a fairly large pop. vote lead or a more modest one and be within (or very, very close to within) 100 delegates.  The reason is that it's so easy for the press to pounce on the story if she isn't very close in delegates, or doesn't have a pretty big pop. vote lead, or (nightmare scenario) both.  I can honestly see Wolf Blitzer saying something like "Obama leads in delegates but was not the nominee; has the will of the people been thwarted?"  Then we cut to two Obama supporters and one, possibly pretend, Clinton supporter.  This will happen.  "When we come back we'll have more on just how the smoke filled rooms work."  It would be SO bad.    

[ Parent ]
And... (none / 0) (#137)
by Aye B2 on Thu Mar 27, 2008 at 02:13:20 PM EST
What are the mathematics that have Hillary Clinton winning w/out the superdelegate swing?  When did her winning become the foregone conclusion again?

[ Parent ]
And where is the mathematics (5.00 / 1) (#182)
by Marvin42 on Thu Mar 27, 2008 at 02:49:23 PM EST
That show Obama winning without the super-delegate swing?

I am SO sick of this sophistry at this point. Its either just delusion or purposeful misstatement.

[ Parent ]

My gawd (5.00 / 1) (#184)
by Big Tent Democrat on Thu Mar 27, 2008 at 02:50:56 PM EST
Please bring back jgarza!!!

[ Parent ]
Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! (none / 0) (#196)
by waldenpond on Thu Mar 27, 2008 at 02:58:32 PM EST


[ Parent ]

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft