home
Bingo (4.66 / 3) (#160)
by ColumbiaDuck on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 02:07:20 PM EST
And i would go further and argue that the reason the Wright videos had such an impact was because they played into a narrative that has been floating around in the conservative/media mind for awhile - that Obama isn't sufficiently American/patriotic (please note that I am not saying this is an accurate narrative, just that it was out there.)

How did this narrative get created? The ground work was being laid last year with the "madrassa" emails, the flag pin emails and the national anthem picture (which was taken last fall as i recall).  So these tiny bits were floating around waiting for Wright to bring it all together.  Now it will float around as a unified picture just waiting for the fall to be broadcast on commercial TV.  (and it's no accident that the "national anthem" picture has become an issue again - reinforcement for Wright.)

[ Parent ]

This is why people see (5.00 / 1) (#216)
by Skex on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 02:55:27 PM EST
Democrats as wimps.

The going gets a little tough and instead of standing up for our ideals we fold like chumps.

Oooh the big mean republicans are going to attack my candidate guess I gotta give up now and run who they want me too.

Give me a break the biggest mistake the Democratic party has been making for the last 3 Decades is to let the opposition frame the debate.

They try to make it about Wright we make it about "bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran"

They try to make it about race we make it about class.

McCain is vulnerable much of his base think he's the Manchurian candidate anyway add to that the fact that he's practically on his death bed and we'll be able to go hell bent on who ever he runs for for VP.

As far as the Wright stuff goes there isn't anyone with in a hundred miles of a TV or a computer that hasn't heard this stuff. But we got 8 months for that too loose it's sting.

Traditionally 20% of the electorate decides the election Obama will get get half that just on the African American vote add liberal younger whites and the anybody but a republican crowd and you got a wipe out.

The Wright angle will be played out long before the november election and the only way this could go at this point is in Obama's favor.

[ Parent ]

Wright's got some new comments that came out (5.00 / 1) (#220)
by cmugirl on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 03:01:08 PM EST
Now he's making comments about Italians

Maybe we can have an ethnic slur a week from this guy.

[ Parent ]

Garlic noses? (5.00 / 3) (#249)
by eric on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 03:26:48 PM EST
Saw this post and googled it.  Here's what I found:

"The Italians for the most part looked down their garlic noses at the Galileans."

"From the circumstances surrounding Jesus' birth (in a barn in a township that was under the Apartheid Roman government that said his daddy had to be in), up to and including the circumstances surrounding Jesus' death on a cross, a Roman cross, public lynching Italian style. ..."

What the heck is wrong with this guy?  Is he trying to submarine Obama?


[ Parent ]

I am not amused (5.00 / 2) (#269)
by waldenpond on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 03:42:52 PM EST
But I am offended on yet again.  I don't think I have ever been thought of in so many disparaging ways at one time.  Now my nose is offensive.

[ Parent ]
Double counting (5.00 / 2) (#251)
by badger on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 03:27:50 PM EST
Roughly, each candidate, R and D starts with 40% - that's where your 20% independent or swing voters comes from.

But the black vote does nothing for Obama with that 20%, because it's already in the 40% he begins with (and I'll acknowledge Clinton could lose some of that vote if she's the nominee). You don't get to count it again, because there are virtually no black swing voters in the 20%. There are a lot of Latinos in the middle though.

Similarly, the youth vote doesn't add much to Obama pulling votes out of the middle. In fact it probably only offsets at best the votes of Latinos, whites and women Obama loses. An increase in black turnout helps him too, but not much.

So that leaves Obama and Clinton in the same place - trying to attract more than half of the 20% that sits in the middle.


[ Parent ]

Hmmm.... (5.00 / 2) (#263)
by ColumbiaDuck on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 03:38:40 PM EST
I'm guessing you were not one of the Obama supporters that spent the first year of this campaign telling anyone who would listen that Clinton was too divisive to win?  Because if I had a nickle for every time I heard that ... (I'd have a couple of bucks based on Obama's statements alone.)

It would be nice if Democrats fought this stuff - see any evidence of this happening?  Me neither.  Until it does, we need to be prepared for the reality that the media will do the RNC's job (as they always do) and try to torpedo the Democratic candidate.  So we need to be aware of and ready for possible attacks.  Saying it's gonna be a non-issue or "played out" won't cut it.

In fact, the Democratic establishment has done an absolutely horrible job of prepping the ground for an attack on McCain.  See here for more.  And I no more expect a vigorous defense from the Big Lib pundits for Obama than they gave Gore in 2000 - ie no defense at all.

But here's the rub for me - The Gore stuff in 2000 was largely bs.  Made up.  He never said he invented the internet.  Didn't lie about Love Canal and was perfectly accurate in his statements about Love Story.  The media twisted and turned all that and turned a stand up guy into a serial liar.  

I am sorry to say that I can't feel as sympathetic about the Wright issue.  Even if you agree with 100% of what he said, he was clearly a political liability.  The fact that Obama didn't move on this earlier, and didn't respond as well as he should makes this a largely self-inflicted wound.  IMO.

[ Parent ]

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft