So Democrats in MI and FL feel disenfranchised? They were. By state officials. Not by the national party who told them the rules and the penalties for breaking those rules in advance.
If you have a football team on the field and the coach decides to send a cheerleader through the tunnels under the stands to place a football behind the other team's goal, there is no touchdown awarded. Counting MI and FL votes is the same as giving a touchdown for such a cheerleader placed football. No one in their right mind is going to demand that the rules be changes.
So who is demanding the rules change? Idiots and Republicans who want to create conflict in the Democratic Party. That's why the FL legislature broke the Democratic Party national rules in the first place. (I have no idea why the MI people did it, and I frankly don't care.)
If the voters in Florida are angry, they can elect a Democratic Florida Legislature. The Democrats in MI have similar options. And the rules are set between each Presidential election. If they don't like the rules, they have input to the rules then. But not when it would decide the Democratic nominee for President. That's too damned late.
The whole issue looks to me like Republican Party Ratfucking, to use one of Lee Atwater's terms. [ Parent ]
The DNC overreacted and decided to punish the Florida voters by disenfranchising them. It wasn't required they do that. It certainly wasn't their only choice.
The Florida legislatures broke a rules. But the DNC disenfranchised the voters. [ Parent ]
Nobody likes it when the parents get home and tell you to turn off the music, clean up the living room and send your friends home. But that's exactly what the Super D's are intended for; cleaning up the mess that the DNC (and clueless politicians) make. [ Parent ]
Make a new account