home
Pelosi said so. nt. (5.00 / 1) (#4)
by Maria Garcia on Sun Mar 23, 2008 at 07:47:17 PM EST


[ Parent ]
Pelosi? (5.00 / 1) (#11)
by white n az on Sun Mar 23, 2008 at 08:15:30 PM EST
Is she one of the party 'betters' that Yglesias refers to?

I am quite certain that any corporate defense expressing the same arguments would likely be held in contempt.

In this case, I think it's the EOP and EOVP that has contempt for oversight, for presidential records preservation act and lastly for the rule of law.

This is an easy one...impeach!

[ Parent ]

asdf (none / 0) (#39)
by ctrenta on Mon Mar 24, 2008 at 09:49:15 AM EST

This is an easy one...impeach!

Precisely!

The Dems can have elections and impeach at the same time. I don't understand why they think otherwise. Besides, history shows the party that conducts investigations into impeachment do well in the next election. Oh well. Looks like they'll never get it.


[ Parent ]

Bother Pelosi! (none / 0) (#30)
by magnetics on Mon Mar 24, 2008 at 01:29:54 AM EST
and that's pretty impolite for Talkleft...

[ Parent ]
Yeah. (none / 0) (#33)
by Fabian on Mon Mar 24, 2008 at 07:25:52 AM EST
B___er Pelosi!

(stupid, weasely, spineless pols)

[ Parent ]

I'm not saying that thought hadn't occurred to me. (none / 0) (#40)
by magnetics on Mon Mar 24, 2008 at 01:23:20 PM EST


[ Parent ]
Still not an excuse... (none / 0) (#37)
by ctrenta on Mon Mar 24, 2008 at 09:42:29 AM EST

... for us not to pick up the slack and demand we have investigations into impeachment. It's not about whether or not it CAN'T happen. It's about doing what's right, regardless of the odds, the naysayers, the this, the that. How much more damage to our system of government are the Dems willing to tolerate? The problem doesn't get solved by waiting for an election. The porblem gets solved by conducting responsible and appropriate investigations into impeachment.

[ Parent ]

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft