home
Double Standards | 96 comments (96 topical)

Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment

That wasn't the reference (none / 0) (#74)
by Marvin42 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 12:23:42 PM EST
It was redefining words to mean the exact opposite. Like to follow the rules and check the validity is CHANGING the rules.

And let me understand: what is you position on Sen Obamas "concerns" on vote fraud for a redo? Because if you think its valid then in once case concern for fraud is good, in the other its bad.

[ Parent ]

Well If Redefining Words (none / 0) (#81)
by squeaky on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 12:34:16 PM EST
Is your main concern,  you are the one guilty of doing that. The correct words would be re-verify, but that would weaken your argument.

Using Orwell does not help your argment in any way, especially when you yourself are being misleading.

[ Parent ]

If you say so (none / 0) (#82)
by Marvin42 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 12:35:39 PM EST
I think you missed my point, but no worries.

[ Parent ]

Double Standards | 96 comments (96 topical)

Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft