home
I don't understand your point (5.00 / 2) (#8)
by cmugirl on Sat Mar 01, 2008 at 02:28:17 PM EST
There's nothing inherently wrong with his statement.  It's just disingenuous of him to say he's "going to listen" when he's had the opportunity for over a year to do some listening and to actually LEARN something about Europe.

[ Parent ]
Well (none / 0) (#10)
by andrewwm on Sat Mar 01, 2008 at 02:30:59 PM EST
I would have liked it if he had done more oversight. And it's a legitimate, but not a make or break issue for me. But Jeralyn was using selective quoting to suggest he's taking up a right-wing position on the issue when he's clearly not (and, in fact, taking the same stand as Clinton).

[ Parent ]
I would have liked it (5.00 / 2) (#18)
by Democratic Cat on Sat Mar 01, 2008 at 02:44:19 PM EST
If he had done any oversight. Seriously, are we paying him to campaign and talk about stuff or to be a Senator and do something? Both Clinton and Obama deserve criticism for lots of talk and no action on the war in Iraq, and Obama deserves criticism for not bothering to do his job on his subcommittee.

[ Parent ]
you don't understnad Andrew (1.00 / 2) (#12)
by Tano on Sat Mar 01, 2008 at 02:32:36 PM EST
Clinton good. Obama bad.

Everything else is a deduction from that.

[ Parent ]

I think (5.00 / 1) (#14)
by Capt Howdy on Sat Mar 01, 2008 at 02:39:43 PM EST
you may just be so used to seeing the exact opposite everywhere you turn it just seems that way in comparison.


[ Parent ]

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft