He'll lose that and more in Ohio, Texas and Pennsylvania.
He finshes down a hundred.
Hillary will be the nominee. [ Parent ]
What if he loses each 52-47? That would limit his delegate losses to about 30-40 total. [ Parent ]
We then have a few more contests before Pennsylvania, most of which he's likely to win. And he'll still have more money than Clinton. Again, decent shot to keep it close--40-45% is enough to limit the damage from a Clinton win.
She still will be fortunate if she has a pledged delegate advantage at all, and then there are still several states left after Pennsylvania, including the decent-sized prize of North Carolina, which I expect Obama has a decent chance to win. I think he'll win 2/3 of the remaining contests on the schedule, and that he'll limit her margins in Texas and Pennsylvania while winning or keeping it a little closes in Indiana and Ohio.
What if Clinton wins Texas but loses Ohio, Rhode Island, Vermont and every state between now and March 4? I think she's done if that happens.
What's interesting to me is that I said "if Obama's even one delegate ahead after 2/5, this thing is over", and you agreed with me. What changed? [ Parent ]
Start making sense. [ Parent ]
And you ignore the other 19 contests at peril to the credibility of the argument. He will likely win most of them, including some decent sized states, and some of them by large margins. [ Parent ]
Make a new account