home
Well (none / 0) (#21)
by Big Tent Democrat on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 10:57:21 AM EST
That does not answer my question. Were you or were you not complaining about the level of coverage of Rezko?

[ Parent ]
No. I've been "complaining" (none / 0) (#25)
by oculus on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 10:59:26 AM EST
that you and J are so adamanantly dismissive of Obama/Rezko relationship being an issue in the GE.

[ Parent ]
So you felt it was being covered adequately (none / 0) (#26)
by Big Tent Democrat on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 11:00:23 AM EST
by the Media.

I stand corrected.

[ Parent ]

you just did it again (none / 0) (#49)
by demschmem on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 12:28:32 PM EST
thats not what they said.  why do you feel the need to twist things?

[ Parent ]
Do you mind? (none / 0) (#58)
by Big Tent Democrat on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 01:22:00 PM EST
Oculus is well capable of speaking for herself.

I think you actually will not care for her views on Rezko BTW.

[ Parent ]

While you're here, how about (none / 0) (#59)
by oculus on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 01:24:11 PM EST
requesting the Obama campaign e mail and, if you get it from the commenter, adding the entire text to the Guardian post?  Thanks.

[ Parent ]
i wasn't speaking for oculus (none / 0) (#65)
by demschmem on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 03:01:39 PM EST
i was pointing out another example of your poor logic.  when someone disagrees with you, you pounce on tertiary points and dice words (often inaccurately as demonstrated here) seemingly to shame them - an age old argumentative technique.  you then spice them with closing remarks like, 'i expect this of you.'  i suspect this doesn't cross the official line of your censoring policy, but it distracts from the more interesting discussions that take place here and is a disservice to your posts.  

[ Parent ]
I am proud to say I'm (none / 0) (#66)
by oculus on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 03:05:18 PM EST
not all that worried; in the past, yes; but now, no.

[ Parent ]

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft