home
Irrelevant (none / 0) (#14)
by LarryE on Sun Sep 16, 2007 at 11:49:53 AM EST
he was a fugitive

The issue under discussion was the implication that his political contributions were illegal. His "fugitive" status was unrelated to that except as a basis for little more than idle speculation.

Flight ... leads to suspicion of guilt

Suspicion is not evidence.

were Rove's bundler all of you would cite it as ... proof of the corruption of the Republican party

Not without evidence of some sort of quid pro quo or purchasing of special access or favors, I wouldn't - and evidence of that is exactly what's missing here. Your argument is just another case of an accuse-the-accuser attempt at distraction.

[ Parent ]

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft