The reason I ask is because one of the planks of the 'impeachnik' platform is that impeachment hearings will bring out all the evidence needed to make Bush look like such a monster that those 17 GOP Senators will have no choice but to vote for removal.
But it seems to me that the WH can stonewall those hearings just as much as they are stonewalling current congressional hearings, as KagroX writes about. So how, then, can impeachment be a remedy for the original stonewalling, especially if the courts rule in Bush's favor, as KagroX cynically suggests they will do? [ Parent ]
The Congress, Fred Thompson in particualr when he was a Senator, have claimed there is not executive privilege or attorney client privilege that the Congress must recognize period, not just in impeachment settings.
There are claims that impeachment hearings do not permit claims of executive privilege.
These are mere claims. They have never been tested.
Again, as is always the case, we must rely on the Courts or the power of impeachment or removal when it comes to claims of privilege before the Congress, including claims of executive privilege. [ Parent ]
Honestly, I am going to pin a tail on dkos on this issue. [ Parent ]
Make a new account