home
Why Inherent Contempt III | 71 comments (71 topical)

Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment

Poor Jim, I didn't mean to hurt your feelings... (5.00 / 3) (#34)
by Aaron on Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 10:51:18 PM EST
...but somehow I knew you wouldn't answer the question, as to exactly where your loyalties lie.

But I'll pose the question in a multiple-choice format to make it easier.

Where do your loyalties lie Jim?

A. The United States of America.

B. George W. Bush and his administration.  a.k.a. the treasonous dogs

C. Vladimir Putin and the resurrected Soviet Union.

I'd like to believe it's America, but somehow I think that we both know that deep down inside in that place you keep hidden, you're a Bush lover through and through, right Jim? It's OK, everyone can see it, you can come out of the closet.  Just be who you are Jim, you'll feel so much better about yourself.

[ Parent ]

Aaron, I think this point is where ppj (none / 0) (#36)
by Edger on Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 11:13:10 PM EST
goes into complete avoidance and ignore mode.

[ Parent ]
He went to bed... (5.00 / 1) (#39)
by Aaron on Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 11:33:00 PM EST
... but he'll be back again in the morning.

Jim is nothing if not consistent.

But sometimes I feel bad for him, and many of the Conservatives who have been so let down and used by the people they put their faith in.  It's not an easy thing to come to the realization that the people you support politically care nothing for you, and take you entirely for granted.

Perhaps the Bush administration will be enough to rouse them from the hypnotic slumber they have suffered under for so many years.  One can only hope.

[ Parent ]

Yawn..... Aaron (1.00 / 1) (#42)
by jimakaPPJ on Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 11:51:23 PM EST
Do you still beat your wife??

I gave you  calm, reasoned response to your greatly over heated rhetoric.. I quote:

Court-appointed Congressional torturer:  Tell us who the traitor is piggy!  

Karl, dripping on the carpet:  I'll talk I'll talk! Just don't dunk me again please!

And you actually thought you would receive a comment???

Really. How drool.

I was kind enough to point out my position that I am a social liberal who believes in national defense..

As I have pointed out time and time again, my social positions put me at odds with Bush, but being rational, I have found that I don't have to agree with everything thing people do to take advantage of the things that they do that I am in agreement with. In fact, most people find that a rather mature, rational appoach to life.

Since you have been around a while, and since I have pointed all of this out before, I assumed you had read it at least once and were capable of remembering it.

BTW - All of these are in the archives.

So you were either willfully disregarding facts that you had previously been told, or have the world's worst memory.

Being gracious, I assumed the latter and went back over the basics. My reward was a bunch of BS from both you and edger.

Not unexpedcted, mind you.

So what you read is what you get. Enjoy.

[ Parent ]

An agenda driven by hatred of Bush (5.00 / 1) (#56)
by jondee on Mon Jul 23, 2007 at 11:58:43 AM EST
What an incisive, in-depth analysis.

Of course to go any further into what engenders the "hatred" would involve examining and hashing out too many actual, specific, issues in the clear light and running the danger of being forced to defend the rabidly illiberal indefensible.

Better to stick to the Left-is-full-of-hatred mantra.


[ Parent ]

Un-rouseable. (none / 0) (#47)
by Edger on Mon Jul 23, 2007 at 04:40:13 AM EST
He can't deal with it, Aaron. He can't even deal with your comment.

[ Parent ]

Why Inherent Contempt III | 71 comments (71 topical)

Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft