home
Incredibly, A New Record For Chutzpah From BushCo | 17 comments (17 topical)

Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment

Jim please answer this question: (none / 0) (#15)
by Freewill on Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 02:10:58 PM EST
Ok, why did Bush Senior in 1989, Regan in 1981, Carter in 1977, and Nixon in 1969 etc... fire all their inherited U.S. Attorneys from a previous administration? Why did Bush fire them in 2001?

Please answer those intriguing questions before exposing yourself as only a one sided water carrying authoritarian loyalist who doesn't do the research for his/herself but instead has to be told how to argue the points of misdirection.

Once you answer the questions noted above I truly believe you just might find the answer to the question you posted:

Uh.... Tell me again about Clinton firing all of'em in '93....

However, since I've noticed that you usually pose questions that try to implicate the opponent party as conducting some sort of similarity in the past as a reasoned response for why Bushie does the things he does nowadays please answer these questions without posing another question. Also, please don't use the "Well, I see you didn't answer my first question" as a way to validate truthfulness. That tactic is so Bill O'Really and becoming really lame nowadays!

BTW: Thank you so very much for enlightening me on the blockquote Sensi PPJ.

[ Parent ]

Freewill (none / 0) (#17)
by jimakaPPJ on Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 06:46:29 PM EST
My point was that, although it was poorly made in my desire to note that firing AGs over politics is nothing new or unreasonable. If I offended you I see that you have set the record (I guess) straight.

And did you also fail to understand my point?

Politics then.

Politics now.

No charge on the bockquote lesson.

[ Parent ]

PPJ, what's unusual (none / 0) (#18)
by Dark Avenger on Sat Apr 14, 2007 at 12:36:12 AM EST
is that the reasons initially offered for the firings were ostensibly not political but had to to with 'performance review' issues, which later turned out to be, shall we say, not quite accurate, to say the least.

Also, why hasn't Bushco just come clean and say that 'yes, the USAs serve at the pleasure of the POTUS, and he doesn't need to explain why he no longer wanted them in office'?

Of course, you never accuse Republicans with playing politics over serious matters, so that wouldn't compute with your mind-set, now would it?

TA!

 

[ Parent ]

Incredibly, A New Record For Chutzpah From BushCo | 17 comments (17 topical)

Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft