home
Jeralyn (none / 0) (#5)
by mcjoan on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 02:04:25 PM EST
I think the ABC report is incorrect. They're referring to the Statesman article to come up with eight accusers, but there's still only five listed in the story--four by name and one anonymous.

You are the expert (5.00 / 1) (#10)
by Big Tent Democrat on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 03:16:23 PM EST
on Idaho dirt, Spud.

[ Parent ]
What a claim to fame, huh? (5.00 / 1) (#13)
by mcjoan on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 03:57:15 PM EST
It's something, I guess.

[ Parent ]
thanks, I added (none / 0) (#7)
by Jeralyn on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 02:13:02 PM EST
your caution on the ABC news story.

[ Parent ]
I e-mailed ABC (none / 0) (#8)
by mcjoan on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 02:18:36 PM EST
so maybe they'll clarify. If so, I'll keep you posted.

[ Parent ]
Got the clarification from Popkey (none / 0) (#14)
by mcjoan on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 04:02:23 PM EST
The Statesman story has the five, and they reference three that were anonymous in their previous report. So it totals to eight, but only five are "new" allegations. And Mike Jones isn't really "new" because he's been all over the blogs with it, as has Phillips. So it's really only three previously unheard of allegations.

[ Parent ]
for some reason (none / 0) (#17)
by taylormattd on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 05:59:32 PM EST
I suspect we'll end up hearing about more before the election . . .

[ Parent ]

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft