home
Assuming for the sake of argument (5.00 / 1) (#7)
by Molly Bloom on Fri Nov 16, 2007 at 06:50:30 PM EST
that the DOJ concludes a crime has been committed why would

Bush... tell(ing) 'em to stick their SP BS in their ear.
be "the right thing"? IOKIYAR?

Or by "the right thing" did you mean the right-wing thing?

Again, assuming for the sake of argument that the DOJ concluded a crime was committed, wouldn't the right thing be to prosecute it?

"Once in a while you get shown the light In the strangest of places if you look at it right"
[ Parent ]

Duh (5.00 / 1) (#8)
by kovie on Fri Nov 16, 2007 at 07:48:19 PM EST
Because Clinton did it too--right after he had Vince Foster and Ron Brown assassinated and had the entire White House travel office waterboarded.

Don't you get it? Whatever Bush & Co. did, it's excused because the Clintons did it too! And I haven't even mentioned Sandy Berger, not to mention Janet Reno...

[ Parent ]

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft