home
Contradictory points (none / 0) (#15)
by Big Tent Democrat on Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 03:33:22 PM EST
Edwards can't spend and yet he will use all his money on attacking Hillary?

Actually, I think Edwards is counting on Obama to do the dirty work. And he is probably rigt.

As you can see, I think Edwards is in the best position in Iowa.

[ Parent ]

You have it backwards. (none / 0) (#17)
by Geekesque on Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 03:51:16 PM EST
Obama is counting on Edwards to do the dirty work.

Edwards thinks Obama is too wimpy to take Hillary head-on.

We shall see.

Edwards's themes are all about Hillary.  Which make sense.  Second place behind Hillary is a tiretread mark across your face.

Reality is that Edwards is losing support every month instead of gaining it.  Losing traction.

He's also not viable past Iowa.  Can't win New Hampshire.  No prayer in South Carolina (barely outpolling the margin of error amongst African-Americans there), not enough money to contend on Super Duper Tuesday.

And he'd be out of money between February and August while the Republicans would pound the hell out of him if he did get the nomination, which cuts against his electability.

[ Parent ]

Counting on Edwards (none / 0) (#25)
by Big Tent Democrat on Tue Oct 30, 2007 at 04:51:19 PM EST
Weren't we just promised Obama is going to "take on Hillary?"

[ Parent ]

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft