I say this as someone who asks Senator Bill Nelson, exactly why did I vote for him over Kathryn Harris, if he cannot vote against the lame duck in the oval office, when he (Nelson) isn't up for re-election for 6 more years. If not now, when. He is a spineless fraud of a democrat.
The system is such, that I am stuck with him. What I can do is donate to progressives elsewhere who are challenging wingnut Senators and congressmen. The stronger the Democratic majority, the more likely the Nelsons will vote as a Democrat should, and if not, with a stronger Democratic majority, the more we could afford the loss of the seats held by the Nelsons of the Senate. There is no quick fix.
"Once in a while you get shown the light In the strangest of places if you look at it right" [ Parent ]
But...
...the Iraq Occupation and the FISA amendment are only two issues of many, on most of which the Democrats are incrementally better than Republicans, and this has been used as an argument against the conclusion that there is no difference between them. They are incrementally better. Is that a reason to give them a pass for being complicit in the mass death caused by the Iraq Occupation and in the bankrupting of America? Or a reason to give them a pass for hacking away at freedom and privacy?
They are incrementally better. Is that a reason to give them a pass for being complicit in the mass death caused by the Iraq Occupation and in the bankrupting of America? Or a reason to give them a pass for hacking away at freedom and privacy?
A bigger majority means stragglers can be picked off if they don't catch up with the herd. And it is a herd mentality.
That doesn't mean you and all your friends stop yelling at your Bill Nelson for running as a Democrat and voting like a Republican.
It's using a carrot and a stick, and rewarding them for doing it. [ Parent ]
Make a new account