raising the cost of tobacco does make an economic incentive to quit smoking. Cancer rates are down, but only because less people are smoking. That does have a positive effect on health care.
"Once in a while you get shown the light In the strangest of places if you look at it right" [ Parent ]
does make an economic incentive to quit
Then why do more of the poor smoke??? [ Parent ]
Failure of logic to assume because poor people smoke in greater numbers means the price of cigarettes has no effect on smoking, especially in light of the undeniable drop in smoking overall. Or do you think only the well to do stops smoking?
You really do have a probelm with the fallacy of false cause.
Its fiscally foolish to rely on it as the sole source of revenue.
the some who
might suggest that it sounds like you're saying that regressive taxation is bad, except when you say it's not...
are probably the same ones who believe in supply side economics AND balanced budgets; or
believed Bush when he said Iraq was an imminent threat; or
believed Bush when he said he would fire the leakers.
I don't worry about that group of people thinks.
Make a new account