home
strawman, as usual (5.00 / 1) (#9)
by Edger on Thu Jan 04, 2007 at 10:32:55 AM EST
This thread is about the prosecutions evidence, or apparent lack thereof, and about the integrity (lack thereof again) of the government and the prosecution and their kangaroo court, especially in the face of the fact that "the government has reserved the option, should the prosecution fail, of returning Mr. Padilla to the military brig." (so much for justice...)

Try to focus. And try to avoid denial. You could be in Padilla's shoes one day.

[ Parent ]

edgter is soooo obtuse (1.00 / 3) (#25)
by jimakaPPJ on Thu Jan 04, 2007 at 11:39:44 PM EST
Catch a clue edger, you are embarassing yourself.

My comment was exactly about (part of) the evidence, and what Barb makes of it.

[ Parent ]

Yes of course, ppj (5.00 / 1) (#34)
by Edger on Fri Jan 05, 2007 at 09:28:13 AM EST
Your question was: Would you argue that it is his right to be trained to be a terrorist in an organization that has attacked the US and conspired to do so?

You have reliable information that Padilla was trained by the bush administration?

If so please provide it, or a link to it. I would think the prosecutor in this case would like to see it as well.

[ Parent ]

A simple question (none / 0) (#39)
by jimakaPPJ on Sat Jan 06, 2007 at 12:40:22 PM EST
I would note that this a charge of the government.

But the question isn't about that.

The question is about your personal opinion.

Would you argue that it is his right to be trained to be a terrorist in an organization that has attacked the US and conspired to do so?

[ Parent ]

no (none / 0) (#40)
by soccerdad on Sat Jan 06, 2007 at 12:43:19 PM EST
its about you shifting the goal posts yet again


[ Parent ]

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft