"I don't believe in anarchistic violence, but in directed violence. That would be violence directed at the institutions which perpetuate capitalism, racism, and sexism, and the people who are the appointed guardians of those institutions, and accompanied by popular support."
"I don't have any problem with Mao or Stalin or the Vietnamese leaders or certainly Fidel locking up people they see as dangerous. Because so often, dissidence has been used by the greater powers to undermine a people's revolution."
"The September 11 terrorist attacks on America were an "armed struggle" like Hiroshima and Dresden. I have a lot of trouble figuring out why that is wrong, especially when people are placed in a position of having no other way."
These are the words of Stewart. If these words of Stewart make her a liberal, then I have no problem calling a 'liberal' a traitor. All TL readers that defend her words are traitors. Thank you for the clarification.
Drop the 'liberal' moniker. If you defend her, you really push the word patriotism... Defending America haters is the same as being an America hater. (and I dont mean that for attorneys defending the accused.)
Make a new account