home
Re: A Bad Detainee Bill Gets Worse (none / 0) (#6)
by Edger on Wed Sep 27, 2006 at 09:49:18 AM EST
the right to "examine and respond to" the evidence. The latest version drops the word "examine," leaving suspects with the useless right to respond to evidence they aren't permitted to see. So secret trials, the repeal of habeas corpus and the Fourth Amendment, and expansion of military trials to acts committed by U.S. citizens on U.S. soil isn't enough? What will it take to get your attention, Dems? The Star Chamber Is Back by Paul Craig Roberts, August 18, 2004
During the cold war, Western freedoms were favorably compared to the Soviet national identity card, which increased secret police efficiency.
...
President George Bush and his Attorney General, John Ashcroft, have resurrected the "Star Chamber," made infamous by the Stuart kings in the 17th century for arbitrary, secret proceedings with no right of appeal. Today, American citizens can be arrested and held in secret indefinitely without being charged. ... If you think you still live in a free society, consider: The Patriot Act overturns the attorney-client privilege, and attorneys who aggressively defend their clients can be indicted for "aiding and abetting terrorism." ... September 11 was caused by intelligence failures, not by civil liberties. Yet, the government's response was to attack civil liberties. ... Where do matters stand? [...] If the government declares you "an enemy combatant" or a "material witness" you have no rights. The government can hold you forever without charges or until you admit to some offense in order to escape from isolation and from psychological and perhaps physical torture. I would rather take my chances with terrorists.
It appears that we are Paul... and they are in the White House now, and in Congress. Too bad not enough people listened to you two years ago. At least some are listening now. Not "too little, too late", I hope.

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft