home
The Rove team would benefit by eviscerating Leopold's veracity now before Rove's case ends up in the same public forum as Libby's. It's one thing to have open court documents and another to have sources close to bone that might undermine your attempts at media manipulation. Cut the cancer out quickly before it spreads. That being said, I'm still not sure what side I come down on as to Leopold's accuracy. I repeat this which I left on an older thread of the same topic. "Still one last question begs but wasn't asked, interestingly enough, "Has Karl Rove received a target letter?" Not that I'm handing the benefit of the doubt to Leopold, but the entire line of questioning all rests on the first question which bases the entire line of questions on this taking place on Friday. For if that were not the case, that this is all based on Friday's activities then there is no possible way that Corallo could have responded in the negative to "Did he communicate in any way with Karl Rove's representatives?" That could only conceivably pertain to Friday (unless he's completely lying) because, of course, Fitz has been in communication with Karl's reps throughout.

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft