home
Re: 'Photo Cop' Gets Fired in Mpls (none / 0) (#1)
by sarcastic unnamed one on Wed Mar 22, 2006 at 01:32:11 PM EST
This exact scenerio occurred to me on the thread a few days ago about allowing 911 calls to be admissable evidence w/o the caller him/herself testafying. It seems to me you can't cross-examine a 911 tape any more than you can a "Photo Cop" photograph. Maybe the lawyers here have some insight...

  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft